Uproar as Poonam Pandey’s ‘death’ from cancer revealed as publicity stunt (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Actor and model is being condemned for the stunt, which has been branded ‘insensitive’ and ‘morally reprehensible’ by her followers and medical professionals

A scandal has erupted in India after it was revealed that Bollywood actor and model Poonam Pandey is still alive after a statement was shared to her Instagram account claiming she had died from cervical cancer.

On Friday 2 February, a post from Pandey’s official account, which has more than 1.3 million followers, said she had died from cervical cancer at the age of 32.

“This morning is a tough one for us,” the statement said.

“Deeply saddened to inform you that we have lost our beloved Poonam to cervical cancer. Every living form that ever came in contact with her was met with pure love and kindness.”

The news was later “confirmed” by Pandey’s team to a number of Indian national news outlets including NDTV and News18, while her manager Nikita Sharma hailed her “unwavering spirit amidst her health struggles” in a statement to the press. The news was reported on by dozens of media outlets, including The Independent.

However, Pandey has now shared a series of posts and videos announcing that she is, in fact, not dead, and that the report was a publicity stunt supposedly intended to raise awareness of cervical cancer screenings.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 29 points 7 months ago

On Friday 2 February, a post from Pandey’s official account, which has more than 1.3 million followers, said she had died from cervical cancer at the age of 32.

However, Pandey has now shared a series of posts and videos announcing that she is, in fact, not dead, and that the report was a publicity stunt supposedly intended to raise awareness of cervical cancer screenings.

I feel like there was a similar way to achieve the same outcome more respectfully...

For example, highlighting someone the same age who has passed away and then telling people to talk to friends and family in the screening group. Or even just getting the screening done and sharing that with people. It goes a long way when celebrities help out, as long as it's done properly

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Absolutely. She is sacrificing social trust in news and media, along with her own reputation, for a dubious awareness campaign. My guess is the lesson most people will learn from this is not that they should get the HPV vaccine, it's not to trust media reporting because they have ulterior motives.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

How could they have predicted this outcome from such a brilliant plan? Do they not have a human being in the loop somewhere to point out the obvious stupidity of doing something like this?

A Poo idea from the start.

[-] manbytesdog@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

When you are so self absorbed that you can’t see beyond your own publicity stunt.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

In a separate post Pandey, who is originally from Kanpur, northern India, acknowledged the controversy surrounding the stunt, writing: “I understand that the recent news of my supposed demise due to cervical cancer has taken a minute to digest and I appreciate the warmth and concern that the world has extended in the last 24 hours.

Pandey cited an Indian government pledge in this week’s Budget to improve uptake for cervical cancer screenings and HPV vaccinations, but claimed she could “say with certainty that only a small fraction would’ve registered it”.

Writing under a shared post by PR company Hauter Fly, doctor and author Tanaya Narendra, who has 1.5 million followers, objected to being cited in one of Pandey’s videos.

Munawar Faruqui, a stand-up comedian and Pandey’s fellow “inmate” on Lock Upp who eventually won the series, tweeted: “Can’t process the news.

The original article contains 1,179 words, the summary contains 214 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Grabthar@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Judging from the fact that this made world news, I have to admit it worked. A single post getting people angry about a fake cancer victim proved far more effective than any ad campaign I have ever seen for health awareness, and zero cost! I guess we only pay attention when we are outraged. Fair play, then.

this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024

74 points (95.1% liked)

World News

38578 readers

2148 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.