811
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Swiss food firm’s infant formula and cereal sold in global south ignore WHO anti-obesity guidelines for Europe, says Public Eye

Nestlé, the world’s largest consumer goods company, adds sugar and honey to infant milk and cereal products sold in many poorer countries, contrary to international guidelines aimed at preventing obesity and chronic diseases, a report has found.

Campaigners from Public Eye, a Swiss investigative organisation, sent samples of the Swiss multinational’s baby-food products sold in Asia, Africa and Latin America to a Belgian laboratory for testing.

The results, and examination of product packaging, revealed added sugar in the form of sucrose or honey in samples of Nido, a follow-up milk formula brand intended for use for infants aged one and above, and Cerelac, a cereal aimed at children aged between six months and two years.

In Nestlé’s main European markets, including the UK, there is no added sugar in formulas for young children. While some cereals aimed at older toddlers contain added sugar, there is none in products targeted at babies between six months and one year.

(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Ahhh, liver damage from a young age

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 6 points 6 months ago

I see they are trying to start metabolic syndrome very early indeed.

[-] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 5 points 6 months ago

Johnson & Johnson: Finally, our battle will be LEGENDARY!

[-] maniel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

Why in poor countries? Why not in more developed markets? Is lack of regulations the main reason?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Lower purchasing power. Companies do the same for products shipped to eastern Europe.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 6 months ago

Sugar tax maybe?

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Stand up from about 20 years ago

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] coolteathatisgreen@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Maybe they are trying to cut cost to able to sell cheap in poor country

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Nestlé, the world’s largest consumer goods company, adds sugar and honey to infant milk and cereal products sold in many poorer countries, contrary to international guidelines aimed at preventing obesity and chronic diseases, a report has found.

Laurent Gaberell, Public Eye’s agriculture and nutrition expert, said: “Nestlé must put an end to these dangerous double standards and stop adding sugar in all products for children under three years old, in every part of the world.”

It is not always easy for consumers in any country to tell whether a product contains added sugar, and how much is present, based on nutritional information printed on packaging alone.

The UK recommends that children under four avoid food with added sugars because of risks including weight gain and tooth decay.

Biscuit-flavoured cereals for babies aged six months and older contained 6g of added sugar for every serving in Senegal and South Africa, researchers found.

A Nestlé spokesperson said: “We believe in the nutritional quality of our products for early childhood and prioritise using high-quality ingredients adapted to the growth and development of children.”


The original article contains 774 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] jellyhuemul@feddit.cl -1 points 6 months ago

Until recently in my country, baby formula for babies from 0 to 6 months had to be prepared with 3 grams of sugar or maltodextrin (and 2 ml of vegetal oil) every 100 ml (we had to add it manually along the formula powder). Because it was not enough. It changed because now we have access to formula that doesnt need to be modified to meet babies needs. Maybe the "per serving" in the article is misleading, and I didnt find a direct comparison between the exact product for the same age in the article. And, I don't defend Nestlé either but I think the information given is very incomplete and only creates worry. English is not my first language.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
811 points (99.0% liked)

World News

38859 readers
1945 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS