And uh Tokyo Drift? Really?
Seriously? Ok one more attempt. Trump is the leader of the republican party. The people in the republican party selected him as their leader. I don't know how to make it any clearer but I'll try with a tiny fib: Trump is the republican party. The republican party is Trump.
Trump tells his party "hey write up this legislation, do it because I'm the leader of the party that you are in". Notice that part "because I'm the leader of the party that you are in". That's not "because I am president", it's "because I'm the leader of the party that you are in". And by and large, the republican party will do that. They will listen to their party leader (the one they selected) and write up the legislation, try to pass it in the House of reps, try to pass it in the senate, and then it will land on Trumps desk.
To be more specific, the party will meet, they will discuss what they want to do, listening heavily to what the president/leader wants to do because it was his "vision" for america that got them elected, then write up legislation.
A third party candidate does not have party members in the house or senate that will do that.
If that doesn't make sense to you, you have some reading to do. I think I'm out.
What? Trump was the leader of the party and had a cult following through and through. You're making no sense.
And even if the candidate wins, then what? They have no say in Congress. It's the House of Reps and the Senate that passes legislation. Your new third party candidate can only choose to sign or to veto bills passed by the House and Senate.
Beau on it https://youtu.be/-KX8xddKfeM
I think the differentiator is Saudi official. Government official, not merely a citizen of Saudi Arabia.
Copying my comment from another thread:
The right is very good at picking a name and holding it up to "win". They do this because they can't deal with statistics.
The right is very good at picking a name and holding it up to "win". They do this because they can't deal with statistics.
You know that's interesting turn of phrase that doesn't make much sense.
We were cooking wayyyyyyyyyyy before agriculture.
Agriculture is different than cooking.
I mean our evolution really kicked off so to speak from outsourcing our digestion. That meant more calories could go to the brain. That's the aspect I'm focused on.