468

Image transcript:

I don't want fossil fuel cars

I don't want electric cars

I want fast trains so I can go visit Grandma

(she's a sweet old lady and I'd like to visit more often without killing the planet, my wallet, or a pedestrian)

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

I don't want fossil fuel cars

I don't want electric cars

I don't want fast trains

I don't want bikes or buses or walking

I just want non-suicidy teleportation :(

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 8 months ago

Honestly, teleporting devices sounds like something Elon would push for to further derail rail projects. I bet he already has a plan to release one in 5 years.

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Lmfao, I can just imagine his first ~~customer~~ victim coming out looking like a Picasso. We'll have all the bugs worked out by next year, Elon swears

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I would trust the time travel device from Napoleon Dynamite more than a Elon teleporter

[-] theotherone@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Bruh, that’s how you get Brundlfly.

[-] psud@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I did a long road trip over the Christmas break, two days of driving on rural highways (1 lane each way, metres from the wheat, barley, and sheep)

The roads paralleled a railway most of the way, but there's no passenger rail - only farm produce

I would've enjoyed doing the trip by rail, even if it was no quicker than by car. The car stayed parked practically the whole time we were at the destination

[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

There is another...

[-] theotherone@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

Thanks for not showing gram grams cream pie. I get emotional.

[-] aew360@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

I wish we could develop it alongside our existing interstate highway system. I also want us to somehow, someway, develop an interstate water system. East of the Mississippi and gulf floods. Southwest is constantly low on water. We would see such massive economic gains from the infrastructure investment

[-] blubton@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I don't know about interstate water systems. In Europe something of the kind is already there, but the ecological consequences are pretty bad. Unconnected rivers sometimes have their own species, but connecting the rivers will mean that species from one river can invade the other. This happened when they connected the Rhine and the Danube. I don't know how big the economic gains would be, but I feel like the world has damaged its rivers enough, with canalization and dam placements.

[-] Pofski@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I would just like to point out that it is not all bad. There are several waterways in europe that have been reconnected in the last 30+ years and that those reconnections have had significant impact on the fauna and flora (in a positive way).

[-] blubton@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Do you have any stories/articles about this you can share? I would love to hear more about it!

[-] Pofski@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Sure. If I remember correctly in Belgium in the 90s (or early 00) they reconnected the schelde and the leie, two rivers that used to be connected but were separated. The intend was to increase the debit that was missing from de schelde. This had a result of more oxygen in the water, increasing fish population and plant growth. 10 years after there were seals (and at some point even a dolphin) spotted in Ghent.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Yes, so much this, tho pedestrians are kinda an optional goal in the grand scheme of things. Maybe let's frame it as saving animals.

[-] Lionel@endlesstalk.org -3 points 8 months ago

How is a train any different? It’s still fossil fuels.

[-] psud@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

It pulls many carriages, full of people, using far, far less fuel per passenger. It is also not unrealistic to electrify the rail network

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
468 points (94.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9379 readers
1573 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS