sorted by: new top controversial old
89

The law, Global News has learned, is currently set to be titled the Reducing Gridlock and Saving You Time Act and could be presented when the legislature returns at the end of October. Primarily aimed at drivers, it will include new provincial requirements on bike lanes.

...

The specifics of the legislation have not been made public but sources told Global News said the government was considering restrictions on towns and cities removing existing lanes of traffic to create bike lanes.

Absolute clowns.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

The problem is tons of free parking everywhere needlessly sprawls out our cities, makes people drive further, and makes actual green methods of transit (like walking, cycling, and electrified public transit) less viable.

In the long term, maintaining car dependency is fundamentally incompatible with addressing the climate crisis. Removing mandatory parking minimums is a necessary step towards ending car dependency.

263
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Exactly. I'm just trying to reframe dumb NIMBY policies like restrictive zoning and mandatory parking minimums as anti-freedom so as to try to get conservative NIMBYs to maybe be just a little less NIMBY.

Absolutely no one is seriously arguing we allow PFAS chemical plants next to kindergartens or that we remove all building safety codes. Just that restrictive zoning (and other NIMBY land use policies) is stupid, harmful, and we should get rid of it.

231
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

The right to a bicycle shall not be infringed

420
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

just a frame, a chain,

two wheels, and grease

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 78 points 4 months ago

Excellent point, brother. Always choose AMERICAN MUSCLE over COMMIE OIL.

855
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

Me doing my part to portray car dependency as deeply unpatriotic. Which it kinda unironically is.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

The raison d'être for RISC-V is domain-specific architecture. Currently, computational demands are growing exponentially (especially with AI), but Moore's Law is ending, which means we can no longer meet our computational demands by scaling single-core speed on general-purpose CPUs. Instead, we are needing to create custom architectures for handling particular computational loads to eke out more performance. Things like NPUs, TPUs, etc.

The trouble is designing and producing these domain-specific architectures is expensive af, especially given the closed-source nature of computer hardware at the moment. And all that time, effort, and money just to produce a niche chip used for a niche application? The economics don't economic.

But with an open ISA like RISC-V, it's both possible and legal to do things like create an open-source chip design and put it on GitHub. In fact, several of those exist already. This significantly lowers the costs of designing domain-specific architectures, as you can now just fork an existing chip and make some domain-specific modifications/additions. A great example of this is PERCIVAL: Open-Source Posit RISC-V Core with Quire Capability. You could clone their repo and spin up their custom RISC-V posit chip on an FPGA today if you wanted to.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

It also had a second rule set where a land value tax was implemented, and the winning condition was when everyone made a minimum amount of money.

A land value tax (LVT) is a levy on the value of land without regard to buildings, personal property and other improvements upon it.[1] It is also known as a location value tax, a point valuation tax, a site valuation tax, split rate tax, or a site-value rating.

Some economists favor LVT, arguing it does not cause economic inefficiency, and helps reduce economic inequality.[2] A land value tax is a progressive tax, in that the tax burden falls on land owners, because land ownership is correlated with wealth and income.[3][4] The land value tax has been referred to as "the perfect tax" and the economic efficiency of a land value tax has been accepted since the eighteenth century.[1][5][6] Economists since Adam Smith and David Ricardo have advocated this tax because it does not hurt economic activity, and encourages development without subsidies.

LVT is associated with Henry George, whose ideology became known as Georgism. George argued that taxing the land value is the most logical source of public revenue because the supply of land is fixed and because public infrastructure improvements would be reflected in (and thus paid for by) increased land values.[7]

It's just a stupidly good tax policy, and we should be implementing it in more places.

!justtaxland@lemmy.world

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Yeah, this is the one piece a lot of people miss: in any decently competitive market, individual firms have effectively zero power to set prices; they must instead accept the prices determined by the market.

Knowing that, the solution to that sort of corporate BS, then, is to ensure markets are competitive by busting monopolies, lowering barriers to entry, and getting money out of politics to reduce the effect of lobbying.

51
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's actually the neat thing about land value taxes; both in economic theory and observed practice, they can't be passed on to tenants.

It would absolutely be a boon for the poor if we replaced other forms of taxation (such as on sales and income) with land value taxes. Plus, land value taxes tend to make housing cheaper, which helps the poor as well.

257
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Exactly. People love to treat it as "a war on cars/lawns/etc.", but it's really a war on everybody who doesn't want to be legally mandated to have those. All we're asking for is to end the legal mandates (zoning, parking minimums, setback requirements, etc.) and for those who wish to partake in those wasteful luxuries to pay their true price without public subsidy.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Tbh, my favorite kind of gardening is the kind that thrives on neglect. I love making ecosystems that thrive on their own, without my constant input. There's just something beautiful about seeing life thrive on its own.

1069
490
17

The Seine is becoming a test case for a European plan to cut carbon emissions by turning rivers into the new highways.

433
209
view more: next ›

Fried_out_Kombi

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF