sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 hours ago

This is a great way to do it too! Many streets even have a 40km/h speed limit but are built wide enough to accommodate 80km/h, so drivers often speed and increase fatalities.

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 hours ago

There are some politicians that will listen, so consider joining a bicycle advocacy group if your town has one. Failing that, guerilla urbanism is an option.

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Some cities are car-centric because we designed and subsidised infrastructure to make it so. We induced a demand for cars by spending billions on building, expanding, and maintaining highways to the point that people hop in their car for a 2km trip. People now have no choice of transport other than a car, and that's a problem. It's literally killing us and our children whowith road violence, lung cancer from emissions, and via our climate.

Your steakhouse metaphor is akin to the entire city consisting almost exclusively of steakhouses. But why bother changing it, all cities are designed only for steakhouses. You don't get a choice to eat other cuisines because it's so inconvenient to go across town to the one Greek restaurant.

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

You're right - I'll stop feeding them.

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 46 points 3 days ago

Bike lanes are proven to increase revenue for businesses in their vicinity. Car parking takes up valuable space in a city which could be used more productively.

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago

Additionally, when you build driving to be the only feasible option then those who cannot drive cannot get around. This includes but is not limited to the elderly, children, and those with disabilities.

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 17 points 3 days ago

There are cycles available for almost every type of disability – it’s actually an inclusive mode of transport that will often act as a mobility aid for people who find walking difficult, people who can't walk far and even those who cannot walk at all.

Evidence from the Netherlands (and increasingly from the UK, where new infrastructure has been built) shows that high quality cycling infrastructure is often shared with wheelchairs, mobility scooters and other assistive modes of transport.

And in general, cycling infrastructure should go hand-in-hand with other improvements to the physical environment too – like smooth, continuous footways across side roads, for example.

So in fact the truth is the opposite of the myth – cycling actually gives people with physical disabilities more transport options and independence, not less.

747
submitted 3 days ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

It's not surprising when we've created an induced demand for driving through which infrastructure we build and subsidize. However, the numbers in Germany and China are changing as they push for non car-centric infrastructure. I can't speak to the other countries.

Places like Copenhagen and Amsterdam used to be full of roads and parking lots. When they built public transit and safe bike infrastructure for shorter trips, they induced a demand and people ditched their cars for safer, cheaper, and more convenient alternatives.

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 days ago

Many communities have some number of jerks. I actually find that people constantly stereotype based on outliers they hear about online. I've met very few vegans who were normal, reasonable prople, yet I've met very many people who steteotype and hate on vegans despite knowing none.

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

Reducing congestion is mostly attempted by building and expanding highways, which is proven not to reduce congestion. The vast majority of the budget is spent on building and expending highways.

773
submitted 5 days ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

Highway spending increased by 90% in 2021. This is one of many reasons why car traffic is growing faster than population growth.

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 days ago

This makes me happy :)

982
submitted 5 days ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
89
submitted 1 week ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

Almost everywhere, ebikes (pedal assist) have speed limiters. What are effectively mopeds are what people complain about. Imo the real issue is there is insufficient infrastructure for them to blend into car traffic safely. When there are 80km/h stroads with SUVs and pickup trucks, they feel unsafe and choose to ride on sidewalks and bike paths. Additionally, they're more noticeable when we're fighting for the scraps of narrow, unsafe bike infrastructure.

My general stance though is that if you get hit by one of those, it is incomparible to getting hit by even a small car going at a slow speed. So, there are bigger problems to solve and directing hate towards them would be better directed at fixing car-centric infrastructure. We don't need more pedestrians, people on bikes, and people on ebikes fighting. Let's fix the infrastructure first because they're another person who understands what needs to be improved.

798
submitted 2 weeks ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/memes@lemmy.ml
147
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

She was driving 120km/h in a 50km/h school zone.

312
submitted 2 weeks ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
54
submitted 3 weeks ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
548
submitted 3 weeks ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

Art by Banksy

293
submitted 1 month ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

x-post from !climate@slrpnk.net

90
submitted 1 month ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
17
submitted 1 month ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
view more: next ›

toaster

joined 1 year ago