23
submitted 18 hours ago by EABOD25@lemm.ee to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

So I often come here, even though I oppose the idea of saying "fuck cars". And yes, I do know it's not completely literal. However, I understand the logic.

With that being said, many people are using cars to be delivery contractors. It's not a necessary utility, but it is useful and is used by the vast majority of (I'll assume) 1st world countries. If vehicle use is reduced, what do you think would be a good strategy to keep this industry going? Yes, bicycles can still be used, but it would take more time, which would raise prices (capitalism). And another obvious solution would be to just do away with it and just go to restaurants. Do you have any opinions beyond those two that solutions I've already presented?

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

Recently, I read of a concept where they put delivery bikes onto trams (without disrupting normal usage). That seems like a cool concept for covering cities.

But I also think that delivery cars are a net positive, because they allow people to not own a car themselves.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

We get rid of the delivery industry and have mail depositories that you have to travel to for most of your mail. Large and fragile/important delivery can and should still be delivered directly when necessary. I think its worth considering how much energy is wasted directly delivering everyones mail.

Just realized you probably didn't mean mail lmao. The answer is cargo bikes

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

That's nice an all, if you're able. If you're disabled, having to go to a depot is terrible. And for bigger things like a mattress you'd need a car to pick them up. In my neighbourhood small packages (not boxes) are delivered by bike so those seem fine too.

My point is that it's not so clear cut. Yes, there's energy involved, but to me it seems worse for each person to own a car to to pick up packages than there being a "mail bus" that circles around the neighbourhood.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 1 points 40 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

Large and fragile/important delivery can and should still be delivered directly when necessary.

This includes people with disabilities of course. Those that are able should use a centralized delivery service in a properly organized city. Rural communities may have to work differently

[-] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago

Serve Robotics, Coco Delivery, Nuro AI. Just a few examples. Eventually you’ll be able to order from Target and they’ll let you know when the drone is parked in the street. You walk out and get your stuff and it drives off. The cost of the vehicle decreases as well as the vehicles mass when you remove all the human occupant safety stuff. Future personal delivery will be wheeled drones.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

That would not work in my neighbourhood. Narrow sidewalks, very old and bumpy. And they would block a wheelchair user.

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 38 points 17 hours ago

One vehicle delivering 2 peoples food is better than 2 people driving out to get food, tbh.

Overall delivery drivers substantially reduce traffic.

For more deliverable stuff like packages, 1 delivery truck delivery 40 peoples packages in one trip us so much better than 40 individual households all driving to Walmart or whatever.

I am fine with the majority of traffic just being delivery vehicles and public transit, those are the two actually effective uses for vehicles at the public level.

[-] abbadon420@lemm.ee 5 points 16 hours ago

I have thought the same thing many times, but I'm not completely certain the math checks out. Does lemmy have a "theydidthemath"? Otherwise I might try to figure this one out for once...

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 12 points 15 hours ago

I do know it’s not completely literal

Are you trying to kink shame?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 19 points 17 hours ago

Cargo bikes are extremely effective in dense European cities but I, at least, exclude commercial and emergency vehicles from my fuckcarsing... I mostly personally object to using cars for commuting - it's an extreme waste of time and resources.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 8 points 16 hours ago

Motorcycle...? Moped even? If it's food, it's the most desirable delivery vehicle currently being used in most part of Asia. Smaller than car, can filter to the front of the light, and faster than bicycle. If it's for parcel, motorcycle still is the best choice if the item is small. Bigger item however, then yeah car might be ideal. But most parcel is usually small, so motorcycle is still much more viable and cheaper to run than a car.

BUT if you want a world without personal car, for medium sized parcel, a motorcycle can have a sidecar added for more item. Big sized parcel can be delivered via a van.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

And another obvious solution would be to just do away with it and just go to restaurants.

that's what everyone did and still most people do. It's a great solution 😉

in france even scooters are rare and almost all deliveries are made on e- or manual bikes (mostly by recently migrated cheap labor 🤐)

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 15 hours ago

Wow, I always romanticized France as having cool scooters everywhere. Guess I was wrong. lol

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago

I didn't ask about romaticization. I asked about personally logical solutions. Romance is not logical

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -5 points 14 hours ago

I realize that. I was merely noting that I'm surprised that there aren't more scooters there. I was under the wrong impression that there were.

[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

I thought the stereotype was Rome and vespas. I haven't been to Europe since I was a small child, though.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -5 points 13 hours ago

Rome and vespa is definitley one

[-] RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee 7 points 17 hours ago

Actually, I'm down in Latin America right now and a lot of deliveries are done by bike or scooter. It actually often takes about the same amount of time when in town, maybe a tiny bit longer depending, but because bikes are more versatile than cars - ie smaller, more maneuverable - they can sort of cut through the traffic much easier. In these urban areas, bikes are often faster to get around with, especially if you have infrastructure for it.

But most deliveries down here are on scooter, not in a car.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago

"it is useful and is used by the vast majority of (I'll assume) 1st world countries"

no, the vast majority of delivery drivers use motor/electric bicycles/scooters/motorcycles

Electric bikes have dozens to hundreds of miles of range, charge fast, have carrying capacity for most cargo.

most countries do all delivery except for something like a refrigerator with motorbikes and e-bikes (and some of them deliver refrigerators with motorbikes and E-Bikes), it works great.

that seems like the obvious way to do it to me, having seen it work in every country except the US, where driving is more heavily tied into ego than utility.

[-] KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol 4 points 16 hours ago

My idea of "fuck cars" is more about reduction of traffic and infrastructure, but services like buses, ambulances, fire-trucks and such may continue operating if needed. In this instance I don't see why, a motorbike or an electric scooter couldn't be used for delivery services, in case of food; or your regular ups/fedex/dhl/usps truck for packages and letters. I'm pretty sure that they are just a minority of the traffic in urban areas.

My main gripe are individual drivers and commuters that take-up a lot of space, create a lot of traffic and are needlessly polluting the environment. I also take issue with car centric design, since everything is incredibly far away or too dangerous to be reachable by bike.

Perhaps we could have very specific licences given to these service providers that would require their companies to pay a hefty amount to operate and issue. And in case of emergency vehicles there could be a government discount or something. That way you "fuck" cars with policy. idk

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

That's why I don't take "fuck cars" literal

[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Electric drones with solar chargers would have been cool. I think Amazon toyed with this idea but it never seemed to happen. My guess is they are too susceptible to being robbed and less efficient due to only holding one package per trip or something like that.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

There should be "parking" spots reserved for delivery services (with a special permit) only, so they don't have to stop on bike paths and sidewalks.
Those need to be monitored closely and any private vehicle parking there needs to be towed right away.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I think about this a lot. I’ve been trying to cut down on using my car and rely more on my electric scooter and recently purchased e-bike, both of which I got from Amazon. Man, I'm addicted to Amazon. I get deliveries almost every day. lol

So, while I’m okay with delivery trucks for things like that, I really wish cities, including mine, did more to promote bikes and scooters for everyday use.

Unfortunately, my city here in the US doesn’t even have a train system, and the bus system is pretty terrible, making it harder to avoid cars altogether.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
23 points (89.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9506 readers
124 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS