1109
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Almost 90 bombs were dropped in one region in just 24 hours.

Russia unleashed an unprecedented bombardment in southern Ukraine overnight in what local officials described as a “massive attack” in the conflict which has continued to rage even as the international community’s attention has moved to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

The Ukrainian Internal Affairs Ministry on Monday morning said Russia dropped at least “87 aerial bombs on populated areas of the Kherson region - the largest number for all time.” At least eight people were also injured in other Russian strikes carried out in the Odessa region further to the west on Sunday night.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WuTang@lemmy.ninja 3 points 11 months ago
  • Russian: fighting an armed country and fueled by NATO members
  • Israel: fighting. I mean BOMBING from their heated offices, civil without shoes and haven't sleep for 2weeks

Oh and between, Russia has been cut off from SWIFT, assets frozen if not stolen, etc etc... Israel? freepass

You can't make more cynical, and binary treatment, you can't

[-] ___@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

I don’t support Israel, but the Russians attacked unprovoked. They’re not 1:1.

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

its true, they should both be getting the same, punitive treatment

[-] Guydht@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Russia: fighting to expand their territory because they want a new world order led by them Israel: responding to their most terrifying act of terror ever happened on their land.

Reason matters, and a lot. Russia has no good reason to invade Ukraine, Israel has a very good reason to invade Gaza.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Theyre both violating the Geneva Convention...

There's no valid reason to violate that, that's the whole point of it.

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 3 points 11 months ago

Actually Israel isn't technically violating the Geneva Convention. When you co-locate civilian and military targets, the civilian infrastructure loses it's protections under the Convention.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The occupation of the West Bank is in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, article 49. This has been established by the International Court of Justice in a ruling from 2004. Israel's defense was indeed that the territory is disputed instead of occupied, but it's the only country that holds this position. Literally the only country in the world.

The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

Sources: Fourth Geneva Convention, ruling of the International Court of Justice (relevant are paragraphs 90-101)

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

The West Bank isn't at war. The Gaza Strip is. That's the area Israel pulled out of and evicted (some at gunpoint) every Jewish settler; even those who had been there since before the 1948 partition plan. They've respected the 1967 borders there with no settlements as a way to prove that pulling back to those borders would lead to peace and not constant terrorism and warfare.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Ok, how does that support your argument that Israel does not violate the Geneva Convention tho?

[-] Guydht@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It doesn't, he just talked about how the west bank is not relevant to the geneva convention, and his point still stands in Gaza. Civilian and terror infrastructure is intertwined in Gaza, and that's his argument.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The withdrawal of settlers and forces from Gaza was not initiated until 2005, which is almost 40 years of illegal occupation. In 2007, the occupation was officially lifted and replaced with a blockade. And they did not pull out their forces and settlers to "prove" that "pulling back to those borders would lead to peace", it was to finally fulfill the duties they agreed on in the Egypt-Israel peace treaty from 1979. The Oslo Accords that resulted from that treaty only exist because Israel did not fulfill their promises after several decades, so there were talks again.

So how about he doesn't contort the narrative so hard that it makes my head spin?

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 11 months ago

Israeli left wing parties absolutely did pull out in the belief it would lead to peace. Their political coalition didn't have the support to do the same thing in the West Bank. They believed that if peace reigned on the strip, and violence continued in the West Bank it would justify a similar settlement eviction in the WB.

The current right wing coalition would have never approved the 2004 disengagement plan. And the violence that followed it is what brought them to power.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] eee@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Lemmy is just weirdly pro-Hamas and anti-Israel.

Don't get me wrong, I think what Israel is doing sucks, but what Hamas is doing is equally bad. This is really a both-sides situation.

[-] Flambo@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

This is really a both-sides situation.

Hamas isn't Palestine. Israeli gov isn't Israel.

When you make simple distinctions like this, things get less complicated.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Pro-Palestinians <> pro-Hamas

[-] RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I'm sorry what is that symbol supposed to mean besides 'back and forth forever'?

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago
[-] RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I've never seen that before. Where is that convention used?

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

This is a symbol for "not equal" in computer programming languages. It is used in some languages, such as BASIC and SQL

https://notequalsign.com/

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

"not equals". It's a matter of taste. Some people prefer != instead. But you get the point. Sympathy for the plight of the Palestinians does not equate to support for Hamas.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 11 months ago

Israel is killing many, many more Palestinians than Hamas is killing Israelis and it has been this way for decades.

Also, doing wrong when done "in retaliation" is still doing wrong.

[-] eee@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Also, doing wrong when done "in retaliation" is still doing wrong.

So... We agree that Israel killing civilians in response to Hamas's attack is wrong, just as Hamas killing civilians in response to persecution by Israel is wrong?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You left out the part where Israel has been murdering Palestinians and stealing their land for decades, and turned Gaza into an open air prison. That kind of thing pisses people off.

That still doesn't make any of this right.

[-] Cyclist@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

You missed the part about Israel fighting Arabs and Palestinians for their very existence since 1948. It's not a simple situation. Whereas Ukraine is simply a megalomaniac trying to expand his power at all cost.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

You missed the part where Arabs had been on that land for over a thousand years before the European Allies decided to sent their Jews back "home."

Also, fuck Putin.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
1109 points (97.8% liked)

World News

38847 readers
2749 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS