sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Will it be able to run Jellyfin with 4K content?

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Hey, nice username!

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Have these homeless people been offered houses in small towns and they refused? Feels like a lot of assumptions are being made here

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

In a planned economy, it wouldn't be unexpected to over-build. In fact, it perfectly makes sense, same as we would over produce a small surplus of anything. Housing isn't ten I to create, and so having reserves ready for use when they're needed in the future is a good thing. It may be bad from capitalism perspective, because you aren't getting a great return on the investment yet. But from a planned economy perspective it's good.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I like open source because of how it affects ordinary individuals. I am not very concerned for businesses. In fact I'd prefer that businesses profitting from free software must profit share with the creators. It would ensure the longevity of the project.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

I mean many US States or regions are not that much different. There's homeless shelters, and the state helps you find a job.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Which country is this that has no homeless?

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

EDIT: Informative comments below have convinced me that the license change is worth worrying about, and this fork is worth supporting.

The new license does not really affect the average person. Only companies offering terraform as a hosted service.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Unity was never open source, right? Different situation.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

In nodejs, at least, it does. The minification and tree-shaking can make code significantly smaller. This can mean smaller cold start time in AWS Lambda for example, or just overall a little less RAM. If your heap isn't that large, that can be noticeable.

It also eliminates the filesystem overhead of resolving and loading modules.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If I just use the flatpak as is, does it already provide filesystem isolation akin to a chroot? I dont need it to be incredibly secure, just some basic isolation is enough for me. I just want the installation to be easily reversible rather than having to track down installed files. Lutris installs a lot of stuff outside of the package manager, so I figured filesystem isolation would provide easy means of undoing everything it does

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I agree with that commenter. I do not claim that "nothing happened". I said this in my earlier comments, that I just don't think it's a problem worth my attention.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

cyclohexane

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF