204
submitted 1 year ago by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

In a planned economy, it wouldn't be unexpected to over-build. In fact, it perfectly makes sense, same as we would over produce a small surplus of anything. Housing isn't ten I to create, and so having reserves ready for use when they're needed in the future is a good thing. It may be bad from capitalism perspective, because you aren't getting a great return on the investment yet. But from a planned economy perspective it's good.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

In a planned economy, it wouldn't be unexpected to over-build. In fact

I wouldn't call that over building though, and that wouldn't explain hundreds of millions of extra homes. Building that aren't being used begin to break down quite rapidly.

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
204 points (91.8% liked)

World News

32227 readers
917 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS