I absolutely can. Parody is an art form, which is something that can exclusively only be created by human beings. AI is an art laundering service. Not an artist.

The law should reflect that these companies need to be first granted permission to use datasets by the rights holders, and creative commons licenses need to be given an opportunity to opt out of being crawled for these datasets. Anything else is wrong. Machines are not humans. Creative common copyright law was not written with the concept of machines being "consumers". These companies took advantage of the sudden emergence of these models and the delay of law in holding their hunger for data in check. They need to be held accountable for their theft.

What makes you think copyright law doesn't apply to companies using copy written data to sell and profit off of? That is not the case. Also, you're putting words in my mouth. Feel free to read my other replies on this thread but I don't feel like repeating myself, but I think it's clear I'm not saying computers aren't allowed to process data that's absurd.

You can try to equate humans to computers all day, and you can even pass laws that says they're the same thing. That does not make it true. A company using software to profit off data they have not licensed (whether it's public or not does not matter! That is not how copyright law works!) is theft.

Please try to sell DVDs of markiplier's publicaly available YouTube content and tell people how you're allowed to because it's publicaly available.

In actual computer science you talk about AI all the time as well but it's not actually intelligent is it? It's just SmarterChild 2.0 and literally has no idea what word it said just before it's current one. Not intelligent. Words are often used inappropriately. The only thing computers can consume is data and electricity by definition, and consuming data is not the same as implementing it in a language (or visual) model that you intend to profit from. This is data theft, unless properly licensed.

Consuming is not the same thing as training. A machine is not a consumer, it is a tool.

Honestly I'd sooner try to fundraise and find a way to hire a person to actually do the job way before I'm going to start taking 5 minutes at every single trip to fill out information. The idea of community made data sets like this is very utopic and nice, but if you ask me it's asking a lot. After all, everybody can edit Wikipedia to make it a better place too, but everybody knows there's only a handful of dedicated Wikipedia gurus.

I uninstalled OSM fast after it drove me to the second closed location

Paywalled

I'm disappointed there will be a subnautica 2. I thought below zero basically ruined the lore of the planet and architects for me. Imo, the planet is done. I don't care about what happens there anymore. The architects are no longer mysterious or interesting to me after

Tap for spoiler

having one in my head and literally building one

. I think it's a huge shame the team is cash grabbing a third entry as opposed to starting a new unrelated title in the same genre.

I realize I'm probably in the minority, good thing down votes don't matter here.

I have had nothing but great experience from Parsec. It's gaming intended, but works perfectly for simple remote desktop use as well. Very low latency. Can start when windows boots, so you can even sign in remotely if you need to restart. Free

Ok but the 50 dollar mp3 player on amazon is literally the exact same drop shipped 23$ mp3 player on temu. It's the same. Drop shipping doesn't have some factory stock being good and some factory stock being bad. That's not how drop shipping works. It's literally the same products available from the same warehouses just on different storefronts, for different prices.