sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He died in hs. I was in college. It was years later. Thanks for saying I'm basically retarded or a straight up terrible human because of a short post on the internet about Facebook.

You are the reason i left Facebook. I'll just block you here on lemmy.

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I don't like online games and a big part of the reason why is 3 of these options

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

My 300$ earbuds can play two sources at once. But an uncompressed signal? Fuck yourself.

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They are laundering the creative works of humans. That's it. The end. They are laundering machines for art. They should be treated and legislated as such.

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I stupid. Is there somewhere that says everything this does?

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Not me. I'm pretty normal. I call it sober #2.

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The paramount+ app doesn't even know how to properly hide the pause icon after you hit resume ffs. It's been months.

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like the photographic equivalent of doping

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Iunno, man. If you ask me, they're just laundering emotions. Not producing any new or interesting feelings. There is no empathy, it's only a mirror. But I hope you and your AI live a long happy life together.

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Well said. "Art launderers" is the best ai descriptor I've come across so far.

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I absolutely can. Parody is an art form, which is something that can exclusively only be created by human beings. AI is an art laundering service. Not an artist.

The law should reflect that these companies need to be first granted permission to use datasets by the rights holders, and creative commons licenses need to be given an opportunity to opt out of being crawled for these datasets. Anything else is wrong. Machines are not humans. Creative common copyright law was not written with the concept of machines being "consumers". These companies took advantage of the sudden emergence of these models and the delay of law in holding their hunger for data in check. They need to be held accountable for their theft.

178
submitted 7 months ago by FunnyUsername@lemmy.world to c/til@lemmy.world
view more: next ›

FunnyUsername

joined 1 year ago