257
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io -5 points 5 months ago

Just a note that a lot of these would be very negatively impactful on many lower income level people who depend on what transportation they can manage. If there was a fast move to replace the needs with public infrastructure like rail and bus, then maybe the financial hit would be less for them. "Get a job within walking or bike" doesn't always work out.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Saying “yea but it has to be done right” is such a load of wasted time and energy that you may as well not bother at all. You think people aren’t going to try to get it right? These aren’t the people you need to convince, they know this already.

I’m also curious as what “a lot” of these actually means because most of them don’t apply to poorer people in the slightest. The only ones I can think of are carbon taxes and weight taxes but:

  • carbon taxes often have a rebate that either covers or exceeds an individual’s costs but hits the extreme users like companies with fleets.
  • poor people buying large expensive vehicles really doesn’t make a lot of sense, now does it? It can happen at point of purchase, at least for a little bit, to both not be suddenly dumped on people AND encourage people to keep their cars for longer instead of swapping them out too regularly.

You’re not saying anything except, especially without any sort of explanation, that you don’t have a firm enough grasp of the situation to be making comments.

Universal speed limiters ARE a waste of time, of course, when we can just build our roads right to naturally slow people.

Trams on every streets would be a tremendous waste of money as well, but a fairly dense network would be pretty feasible.

We also don’t actually need bike lanes on every street, just on streets busy and fast enough to warrant separating the traffic.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

The only thing I can think of is that land value tax actually will just get passed to renters, and anyone just barely owning their home is gonna be fucked if another price jump like what's going on now happens. But that, too, can be fixed.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's actually the neat thing about land value taxes; both in economic theory and observed practice, they can't be passed on to tenants.

It would absolutely be a boon for the poor if we replaced other forms of taxation (such as on sales and income) with land value taxes. Plus, land value taxes tend to make housing cheaper, which helps the poor as well.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Well hot damn what are we waiting for? Where do I sign?

load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
257 points (96.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9506 readers
119 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS