117
submitted 9 months ago by evlogii@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zeet@lemmy.world 76 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

618ml equates exactly to 600ml + 3% - maybe manufacturers add 3% on top because that's the maximum allowable variance in quantities?

From a quick search, 412ml and 515ml both seem pretty common too.

[-] ILikeBasil@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

I think you're on the right track. My guess would be that they have a 3% tolerance (uncertainty, idk) with filling so they fill 600 ml but statistically it might be as much as 618. Putting 618 on the packaging lowers the price per liter a little, compared to 600.

[-] kirklennon@kbin.social 27 points 9 months ago

This seems backwards from what a manufacturer would want to do. The concern with variances isn’t really having too much but having too little in the bottle. If you aimed to put exactly 600 in the bottle, you will sometimes end up below 600. It would make more sense to label it 600, aim for 618, and be confident that you’ll always fill it to at least the advertised 600.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 8 points 9 months ago

That all depends on what they're optimizing for. Underfilling is more profitable, but runs the risk of customer complaints and regulators stepping in.

[-] rbhfd@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Exactly. In Europe for example, you see the stylized "e" symbol on packaging very often. It means that a negligible amount are below the advertised volume/weight.

So if the package says 600ml, they might have to set the machine to 610ml to ensure they satisfy this condition.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 9 months ago

Isn't that e for net weight. So it doesn't include the container. At least that's what I've been led to believe, so now I'll be googling!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zzzzzz@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

This is pretty compelling. I vote "solved".

[-] Nemo@midwest.social 34 points 9 months ago

I thought initially it must be a round number of flounces, but it's closer to 21 than 20floz, so IDK.

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Lambs definitely flounce when they're happy

[-] ares35@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

618ml is 21.75 fl oz in the UK (imperial).

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

How does this not stress you out, Americans?

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

We don't have things in that size. You'll see drinks in 20 oz (568 ml) or 12 oz (355 ml). And naturally for larger size sodas, we have 1L and 2L bottles. The 20oz drinks may have shrunk to 16.9oz (500 ml) though. As for other stuff like shampoo or sunscreen? Those are determined by a random number generator.

Nothing stressful at all about the system.

[-] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

25 years ago we had to memorize conversions and use a calculator (some calculators included a "cheat sheet"). It was 2 extra steps (convert to metric, do any needed math, convert back) but pretty routine once you got the hang of it.

Since then we've had Wolfram Alpha and a ton of unit converter smartphone apps. Even a basic Google query can convert most units.

[-] Thavron@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And yet it's still more convenient that without Google, I can just go: 1 liter of water is 1 kilogram, 1000ml, and contained by a box of 10 x 10 x 10 centimetres. It will start freezing at 0C° and start boiling at 100C°.

(0.264172 US gallons of water is approximately 2.205 pounds, 33.814 fluid ounces, and contained by a box of approximately 3.937 x 3.937 x 3.937 inches. It will start freezing at 32°F and start boiling at 212°F.)

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

Yes, everyone knows metric is nicer. But it's just not an issue at all in day to day life. How often do you need to know the weight of a certain volume of water or the edge length of a cube that exactly contains that much water? For temperatures, everyone memorizes 32 and 212 as a small child and never had to worry about looking it up.

Would I rather use metric? Sure. But when almost everything is labeled in US units, all the advantages of metric pale in comparison to the hassle of having to convert almost every single measurement I encounter.

[-] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

I'm not disagreeing at all, I would totally back a nationwide switch to 100% metric. But I'm also trained in science where it's the standard, and don't really do any carpentry or auto repair where US units are still (I think) the norm.

[-] Nemo@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

We don't use Imperial. We have our own system, US Customary. And our ounces are fractionally bigger.

[-] RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works 22 points 9 months ago

In Canada we have a lot of that and I always assumed we import things from America and then just change the labels. The metric usually converts to a more reasonable number in imperial.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

We get the joy of both here in the US. Both are required to be listed and either can be a nice round number but generally it is the imperial one.

[-] dan@upvote.au 5 points 9 months ago

I love that both are listed.

You do sometimes see nice round metric numbers, for example soft drinks (soda / pop) often come in 2 litre bottles.

I'm still unsure as to why soft drink bottles are measured in litres while milk is measured in gallons... A carton of milk (half a gallon, 1.9L) is almost as large as a bottle of soft drink (2L) so it's strange they haven't converged.

There's also things like the TSA liquids limit, which is defined as exactly 100mL but commonly written as 3.4 fl oz.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Milk has been sold in gallons longer than pop has existed is my only guess for why milk hasn't switched.

The US government has been very on board with metric, for example the US was one of the original signatories of the metric convention. It's just not simple to mandate that people stop using traditional units and instead use the official standard units.

Pepsi and coke both have significant international business, which makes standard bottles appealing.
Additionally, in the mid seventies when the US was last making a push towards making the private sector switch Pepsi as a marketing gimmick switched to a bottle that was bigger than a typical coke bottle and also metric.
https://youtu.be/L6O4UeowF5I?si=fncOmRnbigWOrAsR

They hoped to be ahead of the curve in the US, better value than coke, and use one bottle everywhere.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/L6O4UeowF5I?si=fncOmRnbigWOrAsR

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 9 months ago

which makes standard bottles appealing.

I was thinking about this, but if it's the case, why are cans different? US cans are 12 fl oz (355mL), Australian and New Zealand cans are 375mL, European and Middle Eastern cans are often 330mL.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

There's sadly no interesting answer. They just didn't try the marketing gimmick with cans.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 22 points 9 months ago

What country are you in, OP?

[-] RBWells@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Huh. I put 618ml in Google and hit "shopping" filter and only one item comes up in that size, a hair cream somewhat ominously named Fakeshu.

Unlike the completely unominous sham poo that is also used in hair.

[-] loobkoob@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

I prefer real poo, personally.

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It's organic after all

[-] Devi@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago

Do you perhaps mean 568ml? It's a pint and beer quite commonly comes in that size. Some water, like liquid death comes in that size, and I've just googled and so does shampoo.

[-] yads@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

Possibly started with a different volume then through shrinkflation ended up at 618 mL

[-] Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

0.618? Sounds like ex-0.75 to me

[-] kambusha@feddit.ch 8 points 9 months ago

Which country?

I think the other commenter is on the right track and it's likely a conversion from another standard unit. I would've said pint but a pint is 568ml.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

If all those different products, with different shapes containers, have the same number then I'm not sure

But I do sometimes see things like shampoo coming in weird sizes because of the shape of the bottle

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

Working at a store, you can rest assured that number will get smaller in a year or less. I've caught dozens of products getting smaller but costing the same.

[-] TMarkos@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago

It's rather close to 1/6 of a US gallon, so if sold in a 6pk the pack would be 1 gallon. No idea if that's the real reason but it makes sense to me.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
117 points (96.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43399 readers
678 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS