342
the Settings app, which offers a more modern and streamlined experience.
tl: “modern” means “less usable UI” and “streamlined” means “less functionality”
No no, "modern" means "includes blank space specifically for us to stick ads on".
Less functionality as in "unable to open more than one panel at a time"
I stg Windows, every new UI is aggravating half-baked drivel.
(obligatory remark about the fact I mostly use Linux here)
I'd classify that as under "less usable UI". There's two different concepts in interface design: utility (i.e. can it do what you need it to) and usability (i.e. how easy and effective to use is it).
With utility/"less functionality" I was thinking about people saying they have to still open Control Panel because the "new" Settings still can't do everything Control Panel can do after what, 12 years?
It's somewhat bizarre to me that the settings menu isn't just a reskinned control panel that either launches the new or old items depending on what they've finished so far.
I can't imagine what they've done is easier than rewriting control panel items in full one by one.
You can do a halfway decent job of modernizing just by having an "advanced" toggle that shows the more arcane/less used settings.
I understand the desire to race towards a minimum viable product and get the core functionality into the glossy new thing, but they already had a minimum viable product in the control panel.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Then they would have to remove the various hooks in the Settings app that actually call and open the Control Panel.
How many are there? I can think of several (advanced mouse settings, advanced network settings, printer properties, date & time has a callout back to the old panel..)
Windows 10 came out nine years ago, so they don't seem in any particular rush.
Lol. I think they claimed that Settings was going to replace Control Panel when Windows 8 came out. It’s been 12 years. 😂
It’s long overdue for MS to shit or get off the pot. Either allocate some resources to this pet project or give up the pretense that it is ever going to happen.
I don't understand why the control panel UI wasn't modernized instead? Would that really be unfeasible? I think it still might have been less work than to maintain 2 coexistent "settings/control panel" apps and migrate from one to another. Sometimes you have to throw out the old code base and start from scratch. But if you do so shouldn't you rather distrubute the result when your finished and not in a half-baked compromise-like state?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Sound is in there too. The one that annoys me is the printer settings being under “Bluetooth” instead of “printers”.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
"Streamlined"
What a fucking load of steaming bullshit. The Settings app is complete dogshit compared to Control Panel. If I want to click through 6 pages of nested settings pages for Networking, or 1 screen of all the settings in one place, I think I know which one I would call "streamlined".
Jackasses.
Also it's just broken. Try to add an IP without gateway and it won't let you.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Someone found something that still depends on the control panel that will not be easily moved or done away with I bet.
More like, the devs already knew but some middle manager promised they would remove it without understanding the ramifications, and now they've been schooled.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Maybe that's why the dialer app is still there as well.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I don't even use Windows anymore and I cringe at the thought of being forced to use the Settings app over Control Panel.
As an occasional windows user I was trying to come up with a counter-example for you but I couldn’t think of one lol.
Edit: oh it’s cool that it supports night/dark mode!
I found it easier to search for settings that are supported by it. It tends to catch things even if the wording you use isn't the exact name of the setting. The Windows search to bring up the control panel options from before they implemented the Settings app search has never really been reliable unless you recall what it's actually called.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Knew it. They won't dare invalidate the 35-year-old government PDFs instructing people on how to enable their firewall or whatever.
35 year old? The pdf could be released last week and most tasks would still require the control panel.
load more comments
(1 replies)
"deprecated" doesn't usually mean removed, just that new things shouldn't use it because they may remove it at some unspecified time in the future. Some programming languages have had deprecated features for over a decade.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The updated language is what they’ve been saying since a couple years after Windows 10 came out. This story just went back to not being news lol
load more comments
(1 replies)
I think this is likely to be what I saw others mention on earlier posts. Lots of enterprise or business software that hooks into the control panel.
So even if Microsoft does migrate all the Windows options over to settings there's still going to be software that uses control panel to manage their own settings.
Unless Microsoft is going to make it possible to hook into the new settings app just as easily then they're going to have to keep the old one around even though they keep crippling it.
They're probably just going to disable it for manual access and add a regkey that you can add to regain access. (They've done the same for other 'deprecated' features)
Yeah it's annoying as hell, wish they'd stop killing their own OS. I honestly think the first few builds of Windows 11 were a decent step in the right direction in terms of actually getting everything feeling relatively cohesive again. But the AI push and everything that happened right after release has started to let the rot creep back in again.
Next GPU I get I'm just going to run Linux as my main OS and have a VM with a GPU pass through so I can stop losing my mind.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The new settings page isn't as good as control panel.
What was wrong with the Control Panel?
Not enough tracking, code is too old to add ads.
Font isn’t large enough. Not enough white space.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Gives the user far too much control of their machine and you can accomplish a task far to easily.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Haven't many settings in the control panel been in the process of being migrated to the settings app for the last uh, 15 years?
I mean good for ya'll at Microsoft, but
And it's not even close to being finished
It really feels like it shouldn't be THAT hard of a thing to do: I mean shit, we're 4 major releases into this, and they somehow managed to put all the features in the original control panel in uh, one release.
you need to keep in mind that microsoft is a small business, so they don't have a lot of resorces to assign to this
You need to keep in mind that Microsoft developers are only allowed to do what the marketing department wants to sell. Unglamorous fixes and improvements are left untouched for years or decades.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Honestly I'm waiting for Settings AI now with CoPilot which changes your configuration based on what you're doing, and only sometimes does stupid shit that you have to stop and sort out.
And then they'd have 3 control panel apps.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Well sure, but what about all the ad spots that wouldn't have been added?
True, I was forgetting about the Shareholder Value(TM).
Which is silly of me, because it's basically the only innovative thing Microsoft has done in the last oh, 20 years?
Watch, you'll have to sign up for a copilot service to access the control panel in the future.
Backtracks, for now
Yea, like Recall. It's coming. They'll just do it silently without any backlash because people will be talking about the new pile of shit Microsoft is doing and also arguing like "no, they cancelled that, here's the link" to an article from 6 months ago.
The biggest offenders for me are:
- I struggle to navigate and make out alle the controls of the settings app. Somehow finding the settings visually is very difficult.
- The new settings app is single instance. The control panel had lots of popup windows and you could open it multiple times which allowed parallel open settings windows.
Why not just enable both? Have the control panel be available but more of a power user kind of thing, where the new Settings page is what gets pushed to the average user. Of course it's more work to maintain both but last time I checked MS were doing alright for themselves and could probably afford it.
They'll just do it anyway quietly later on
I for one would be fine going back to the ini files of win 3.1
It's still better than the registry. Or worse, some newfangled management abstraction that tries to be helpful but just makes everything opaque. Looking at you, systemd.
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
342 points (98.3% liked)
Technology
58063 readers
3468 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS