552
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't mind people making a bit of profit off of it. Gambling, tobacco, alcohol and all sorts of other addictive things are for profit, so why exclude cannabis?

As long as the money is moved out of the hands of career criminals and moved in to the hands of people that can use that money to benefit society via taxes and such.

[-] notapantsday@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

Gambling, tobacco, alcohol and all sorts of other addictive things are for profit, so why exclude cannabis?

I would advocate for treating other addictions the same way too.

Alcohol and tobacco ads are targeting young people because they're more likely to develop a lifelong addiction if you start them early enough. Gambling machines are set up to make people believe they can beat the system, so they stay hooked.

I just don't think these should be legitimate business models.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I agree with your line of thinking, but I think being practical that things like smoking and drinking, whilst they should always be discouraged, will always be a part of human nature.

If you can balance the harm these addictive things do with sin taxes that make a net benefit to society, I think you're making the best of a bad situation.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I agree, as long as it's well regulated it should be fine to sell at a profit.

But maybe the problem for legislators is that the definition of well regulated is unknown, as the legalization in itself is kind of an experiment, and we don't know for sure how it will work out.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

To begin with I'd be happy with keeping regulations in line with alcohol, no sales to under 18s, if your supplier can see you're too inebriated they have to refuse to sell you more etc.

It would be an experiment, but I fail to see how it would be worse than the black market which is by it's nature, wholly unregulated.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

I agree 100%, IMO it's not that much of an experiment, but when politicians are strongly warned by police, as they are here, I think that makes them cautious, because if it fails, they were warned about it.

As I see it, legalizing Cannabis would reduce crime, especially help to not finance gangs and organized crime. It's a no-brainer IMO.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
552 points (98.6% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2497 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS