sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yh, I'm not for bailing out companies that are "too big to fail", I see it as socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor, but that's a separate debate.

Tech stocks were a interesting case as they bloated far beyond their actual value during COVID, what happened in 2023 was probably somewhat of a renormalization and now they're back to business as usual. There will always be peaks and valleys, but I'd be very surprised to see tech stocks fail in the long term.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'm not going to argue that there has been no progress, just that it's not on the same scale.

Look at the difference between phones from 2004 to 2014, then from 2014 to 2024 and surely you'd have to agree. We're looking at huge leaps in tech and innovation Vs much smaller incremental improvements.

And I'd once again like to state that this is not a complaint, just a point of view showing that astonishing amounts of technological innovation are not necessarily required to keep companies in business.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

On the contrary, I absolutely appreciate it. I was about 15 when mobile phones first became a thing that everyone owned, so I've lived through the entire progression from when they were something only a well to do businessman would have all the way through to today. The first iPhone was 2007, 17 years ago btw.

When mobile phones became popular, each new generation of phones saw HUGE improvements and innovation. However, the last ten years has pretty much just been slight improvements to screen/camera/memory/CPU. Form wise and functionally, they're very similar to the phone of ten years ago.

I understand that some technophiles will always be able to justify why the new iPhone is worth £1600 and if that's what they want to spend their money on then good for them, but I personally think that they are kidding themselves. Today you can get a brilliant phone for £300 or even less.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

In more recent news;

BBC News - Samsung profits jump by more than 900% on chips https://www.bbc.com/news/business-68738046

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

I agree. Smartphones, for example, have hardly changed at all over the last ten years, but you don't see Apple and Samsung going out of business.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I remember when running counter strike at 30fps on a 480p monitor meant you had a good computer.

Modern graphics are amazing, but they're simply not required to have a good gaming experience.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Murder implies intent. If the assailant, knowing they had COVID, purposefully coughed in to the face of the victim with the intent of infecting them, then you have a point. But the article does not imply that is what happened.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

The hostages were hamas

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Follow up question, are there any meats that aren't edible?

I've heard that you shouldn't eat the livers of predators due to poisonous amounts of vitamin A that can be built up in them, but that's strictly offal rather than meat.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Whilst both forms of processed meat, luncheon meat and spam are not the same things.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Record wettest in parts of Scotland.

BBC News - Official: Parts of Scotland had record-breaking wet summer https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr5n7nn289do

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If you're going to dump it at the side of the road, why bag it?

235
submitted 2 weeks ago by 13esq@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
58
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by 13esq@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

The weather has finally warmed up here and now there plenty of super annoying houseflies. They're way to fast to swat and have an annoying habit of landing on you.

I've tried Google's suggestion of water/vinegar and a bit of dish soap in a bottle, but they don't seem to go for it at all.

I'm up for trying anything, please make suggestions!

Edit: Thank you to all for your suggestions. So far I've tried the idea of spraying them with surface cleaner which appears to work well

28
submitted 3 months ago by 13esq@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
46
submitted 4 months ago by 13esq@lemmy.world to c/videos@lemmy.world
171
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by 13esq@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

It's already well known at work that I don't just not like gore videos but that I hate them and actively avoid them.

A colleague sent me a video of a man being murdered by axe via WhatsApp to my personal phone on my lunch break. Before I opened it I asked if it was a video that I would want to see (because I know what sort of character he is), he implied it was fine.

Despite my suspicion I took his word and watched it. I immediately scolded him, he then made light of the situation, I told him that it wasn't funny and that if it ever happened again I would be making a formal complaint immediately.

A couple of minutes later, another colleague came in to the mess room, the guy that sent the video made fun of me for not liking the video in front of them. I told him that he was making fun of me and that I wasn't ok with that.

Do I have the right to not be sent murder videos? What would an employer do if I made a complaint?

view more: next ›

13esq

joined 1 year ago