255
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That sure will encourage work on environmental issues. /s

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It will make the climate crisis be covered in headlines and make it harder to ignore. This IS a legitimate form of protest. They didn't do any harm and brought attention to their cause.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 7 months ago

They weren't doing it for the climate crisis.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah the article is a bit strange. They call them environmental protesters but they seem to have been protesting food insecurity. Which I guess can be considered environmental but isn't usually what I think of.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

Especially when you consider the famines that yhe climate crisis will cause. And yeah that's piss poor reporting, they call them environmental Protesters multiple times...

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

I think that's fine. Unless we're talking about greenhouses or urban indoor gardening, food grows in the environment. If you want to protect the food, you implicitly have to protect the environment, which makes you an environmentalist driven by food. There are lots of hazards which have little to do with climate (or at least which also have other, climate-unrelated causes), which can affect food. Invasive species, plastic, overfertilization, corporations, general socioeconomic disparities, just to name a few.

load more comments (55 replies)
[-] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 19 points 7 months ago

Name a better form of protest to get the people's attention.
Spoiler: They've tried that before.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Funnily enough this has been the most successful form of environmental activism to this day

[-] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 13 points 7 months ago

Successful in pissing off the general public and causing them to ignore anything of substance that you have to say, sure. Pushing people away from your cause is not a good strategy if you want to effect change.

[-] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 14 points 7 months ago

Hey guys science says our plant is heating up due to carbon emissions we are creating by burning fossil fuels. Can we tone it down a bit?

No

Hey guys going to chain myself outside, because this is super important

Don't care

Hey guys, going to burn myself alive to protest climate change

Meh

Soups and super glue on art!

Oh the humanity! Why would you not engage with us in simple conversation before chucking a cream of tomato onto bulletproof glass!?

Wait..... THAT'S WHAT GOT YOUR ATTENTION?!

[-] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

People were talking about climate change though. Movements like FFF (until Covid took the wind right out of their sails) had quite a bit of momentum, and actually were making it a mainstream topic.

Protests like this are getting people to talk about what you did, not about why you did it.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

I mean it has us talking about why they did it, right?

[-] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

We're not the people they need to reach though. I don't think either of us needs convincing that urgent action is needed on climate change, it's our boomer parents, coworkers, etc. who need convincing. And if someone's attempt at helping with that ends up making climate activists look like deranged vandals then please for the love of God stop trying to help.

[-] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago

Literally killing yourself to protest climate change has barely made the news so yea, for some reason people only talk about it if you throw soup at glass in front of art for some reason.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
255 points (88.8% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2540 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS