96
submitted 1 year ago by snek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rodolfo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's great. I'm glad they released two hostages.

I can't read the article, I don't have an account on that site and I hit the paywall.

I'm genuinely happy to hostages were released.

https://archive.ph/ZJnM9 I was able to read the article. It looks like they dropped off the hostages at the Red Cross.

[-] rodolfo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

ok, long story short. two people were released, red cross helped. hamas got these points hit:

  • they shown that Netanyahu govt wouldn't help release the hostages
  • see? we collaborate with red cross, dear westerners, what do you have to say?

the narrative, all that matters is the narrative. hamas seem they started getting this concept...

so, did I show you why you and your deductions were wrong all the way? do you understand why hamas, Netanyahu govt and everyone else (you included?) is trying to push a narrative? do you understand now why it's a terrible attitude?

justify either party, and one might get some blood on themself.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 year ago

No, this proves I was right The entire time.

Okay let's start over from the beginning

A. Hamas makes a statement, they want to release hostages no strings attached, Israel won't let them ao they can't.

B. Hamas is saying they have no ability to release hostages without Israeli assistance

C. The UN, and the Red Cross, operate inside of the Gaza strip

D. Hamas has access to the Egyptian border

Hamas statement is a lie, because point b contradicts point c and d.

Hamas statement is a lie because point a is contradicted by the contradiction and point b.

In war everybody lies, I fully acknowledge that, but here we have a statement that is self-contradictory in itself. Pointing out that this is a lie is not taking a side, it's pointing out that this is a lie.

If people wanted to say the initial release of two US hostages, had some consideration for Hamas, and they were trying to hint that they wanted the same consideration again to release two Israeli hostages. Fine. But their statement would still be a lie, when they said they didn't want anything to release these hostages for humanitarian reasons.

The fact that today, I guess yesterday now, they released hostages via the Red Cross is great. But it doesn't change the fact they were lying earlier. They don't need Israeli cooperation to release hostages as they've just demonstrated.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
96 points (88.1% liked)

World News

38847 readers
1921 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS