sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

"You're breaking my ~~heart~~ DNS, Anakin!"

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 60 points 8 months ago

ahh shit...here we go again

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

What if they learn to open doors?

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Meta could in theory do this

Meta can do this only because it owns all the 3 companies. No private entity would want to exchange user-data with others.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

Now witness the power of this fully open-source social media platform!

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

I was checking up on this topic. Turns out that 2D printing is harder than 3D printing. Getting the ink to properly settle on the paper and the nozzle are the hardest tasks.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

Electronic voting for deciding a conference/meeting venue is fine, but anything involving governance over a large body of people is a strict no-no.

Reason: if other nation states are interested in tampering with the election, they can easily do it with the amount of resources they have. Paper vote is a distributed system which is very hard to tamper AT SCALE.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I feel like you can fix linux as quickly as you can fuck it up (as long as you know what you did)

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

and we posted about it on this website.

In my personal experience, these sort of things happen rarely, unless you are using some sort of rolling-release distribution. For all my mission-critical docker apps, I wait for at least a week after a major update has been pushed and check the dev website.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

xavier666

joined 1 year ago