sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] vzq@lemmy.world 64 points 3 months ago

This sounds really expensive. 5G as a backup makes sense, but 30 bucks is actual primary service money, not just in case money.

Make it 5 and I would consider it.

[-] vzq@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Lemy has such a hard on against nuclear

Maybe you should spend more time outside. Every flavor of nuclear has worse approval ratings than most dirtbag politicians.

I'm seeing reports by antinuclear think tank grifters shoved in my face almost daily...

Why do you think you need to PAY people to oppose nuclear? After seven decades of cockamamie “this time it’s different” schemes most people just moved on.

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

No. I’m not German. We run our reactors as long as possible because free money is free money ;)

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nuclear technologies missed their window. The use cases where they are the best technical solution now are extremely limited, and that means you can get the investment going to improve them.

It’s a curiosity now.

There’s an alternative timeline where Chernobyl doesn’t happen and we decarbonize by leaning on nuclear in the nineties, then transition to renewables about now. But that’s not our timeline. And if it were, it would be in the past now.

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Surely you made a typo? 50 MW is a tenth of the electrical yield of the smallest PWR you can profitably operate.

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Fucking finally!

I mean, I’m still going to get almost everything from the App Store, but it’s nice to have the option for the few niche things.

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

It’s not meant as an insult. It’s an intelligence term of art.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot

But yes, I also think you are a plain old regular idiot too.

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Was just a question

The useful idiot’s rallying cry!

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

Hums the Internationale while reading the article.

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Is even better! When a field changes from male dominated to female dominated, incomes across the field plummet!

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Who made you king then?

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Python has gotten faster, but it’s still nowhere near what you expect from traditional compiled languages. It can’t be.
The trick to writing performant Python code is to get good (native) libraries and let it handle the heavy lifting.

For performance sensitive stuff, the fact that pure Python is very slow really matters. For stuff that’s not performance sensitive (that is, 99% of the code out there) it doesn’t really matter, but even then it’s better to be fast than to be slow.

Now this is not something I would ordinarily have a problem with. I use Python for a reason and it’s not performance. But if I end up writing Python like it’s rust, I might as well do rust and reap the (massive!!!) performance and memory profile benefits too while I’m at it.

view more: next ›

vzq

joined 1 year ago