sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 8 points 5 months ago

Sweet, now I get to put "worked with NASA" in my résumé.

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 67 points 5 months ago

I'm a bit disappointed with the hypocrisy of some commenters here.

So many very questionable articles, posts and statements that can't be verified regarding IDF crimes get treated as the absolute truth. Yet a statement regarding a fake story, verified by Hamas and Al Jazeera, gets reported and isn't trustworthy, since it's from an institution aligned with Israel?

Holy echo chamber, batman.

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 5 points 6 months ago

Steganography is a (fascinating) bitch. There are a lot of ways to hide a message in an image which is very resilient to manipulations like resizing, compression or even the loss of information by actually filming a screen versus taking a screen capture.

If you adjust your approach to not rely on a single picture to reliably convey a short message, but part it out over tens or hundreds of frames in a video, it's basically impossible to make sure that the message was erased without knowing the algorithms used or rendering the video unwatchable.

It's an awesome field and nothing new.

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 22 points 6 months ago

Ah, the meaning of my comment went straight over your head and you resort to throwing insults around.

I'll spell it out then: The fact that the first shot merely went through his mouth, from one cheek to the other makes it entirely possible, even probable, that Gary Webb commited suicide. Even his ex-wife said so:

Webb's ex-wife, Susan Bell, told reporters that she believed Webb had died by suicide.[72] "The way he was acting it would be hard for me to believe it was anything but suicide," she said. According to Bell, Webb had been unhappy for some time over his inability to get a job at another major newspaper. He had sold his house the week before his death because he was unable to afford the mortgage.

Spreading unfounded, exaggerated conspiracy theories while not even getting the facts straight isn't helping anyone but the perpetrators, especially when the CIA actually did commit some atrocious crimes that can be cited by stating facts instead of fiction.

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 9 points 6 months ago

The first shot went through his face, and exited at his left cheek. The coroner's staff concluded that the second shot hit an artery.

Not quite the back of the head.

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 7 points 6 months ago

Gaming on Linux has come a long way and I always prefer to run it on Linux rather than a dedicated Windows boot, if possible.

But if you rely on VRR, DLSS and have a decent HDR display, Linux unfortunately still isn't quite there yet. VRR/HDR is mostly unsupported systemwide currently. DLSS sometimes works, sometimes requires a lot of debugging and ends up actually hurting the performance.

If your hardware setup allows you to run your games at a decent framerate without DLSS/VRR, this likely won't be an issue for you.

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 8 points 6 months ago

Doesn't even have to be malice. I'm sure that most instance admins are great, competent and caring, but setting up a Lemmy instance is trivial, securing it is not.

The default configuration of a proxy could log connections, the config interface may accidentally be exposed unprotected and so on. Again, I'm not saying that most instances are inherently untrustworthy. But, depending on your instance, you are trusting one person or a small team of volunteers to stay on top of everything andyou can't expect them to drain their bank accounts in case of legal issues for you.

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 23 points 6 months ago

What?

Lemmy instances can log IPs and any other info they want all day long, there is nothing stopping them. In some jurisdictions they may even be required to.

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago

Yes, but in fairness: The same is true for iOS or GrapeneOS, though that's for valid reasons.

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

As much as I'd like to use a Linux phone, it's simply not feasible for almost everybody at the moment.

What do people user their phone for?

  • Private conversations
  • Banking
  • All kind of apps

Linux phones, at the moment, are way behind Android/iOS in terms of security and, since privacy requires security, also in privacy.

Even stock Android has so many more security features, that it's not even close. Verified boot, exploit mitigation, (working) app sandboxing and so on. Not even speaking of specialized projects like GrapheneOS.

Even if the app ecosystem was there and the OS mature, I'd never run my banking through a Linux phone at the moment.

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 7 points 6 months ago

That makes a lot of sense, at least from a subjective point of view. Cheers!

[-] suppenloeffel@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

Same, but that's not the same as calling all other products mediocre.

view more: next ›

suppenloeffel

joined 7 months ago