sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] socksy@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago

I suppose there's not a lot of communist leaders to choose from in general, but Kronstadt happened on Lenin's watch and it would be a bit disingenuous to pretend this was controversy free amongst the left and working classes.

[-] socksy@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 9 months ago

Who said anything about streets? The article only mentions removing roads, which makes sense to me

[-] socksy@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago

My personal recommendation is only one at a time though

[-] socksy@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 11 months ago

You wouldn't do this if it weren't profitable. The tenant will end up paying for the furnishings and maintenance many times over in rent, and you will get an appreciating asset that you are gradually paying off the debt for. You're not getting paid for management, you're profiting from holding capital in a system designed to benefit those that have capital, and seeking rent for the ownership of that capital.

I wouldn't hold it against someone in this system we have if they end up buying a property to safeguard their money, but let's not pretend that landlords are not a parasitic relationship that reduce the amount of housing stock available for people to buy and act as a middle man between a tenant and a property management company.

socksy

joined 1 year ago