sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trying to make a large-scale multiplayer game in Godot just isn't possible right now.

Then why did you introduce the examples of Godot and Unreal? The analogy is not valid.

You pick the tool for the job.

Which jobs do you believe the GIMP is not a tool for while Photoshop is?

want to feel superior

LOL that's you projecting. It's a reflection of your motivations.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That doesn't really matter. ... There really is no comparison.

If there are professional designers using free software then it does matter. You seem to think that the functional differences between proprietary software and free software necessarily preclude making a living using free software. You're wrong.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

The problem is ...

... the same as any other industry dominated by proprietary software.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

But in a bizarre twist, the confirmation came only after the EU mission categorically denied the Armenian claim, going as far as to publish a graphic branding the information “false.” The EU mission retracted the message shortly afterward.

Uhhh.. wut?

[-] rah@feddit.uk 37 points 1 year ago

now

Uh.. I think you need to check out the history of computing.

[-] rah@feddit.uk -3 points 1 year ago

they are not feasible for my career

LOL I know a number of professional designers who use free software. Just because you (clearly) don't know any, doesn't mean they don't exist.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

I find it interesting that the salad gets no mention at all, as if it's not part of the meal, like it's not real food.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

The legality of re-distributing the leaked source is questionable at best.

LOL no shit. I'll steer well clear of that one I think.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

messages would still go through Google and their servers

As I understand it, there is nothing Google-specific in the standard. At the moment, Google is the main (only?) provider of RCS services to mobile networks though so data is highly likely to go through Google servers. However, that's not mandated by the standard, it's just a consequence of the current state of the market.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Against the terms of use? Yes.

The terms of use are legally binding. If you violate the terms of use, you're breaking the law.

Illegal? Sort of, but practically not until somebody proves it in court.

Not sure what you're trying to say here. Violating copyright is against the law.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

rah

joined 1 year ago