In most other places...
No, the output in a word processor is explicitly created by the user, whereas the output created by a LLM is based on the training data OpenSI scraped and influenced by a user prompt
The Stranger by Albert Camus, Franny & Zooey by JD Salinger, Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov, and the entire short story collection of Edgar Allan Poe
Using your logic, the one making the copy in a word processor is the person typing, and the one making the copy in this LLM is OpenAI
He was arrested because he faked a ton of information related to his accounts to make it look like many people were doing it. I love that he gamed the system, but also it sounds like he totally committed financial fraud while doing so.
There are other people who have gamed the system without also committing fraud
That's not true at all, there are criminal penalties on the books for this sort of thing in pretty much all western countries
The "they" in this sentence are Danish actresses, so it doesn't actually seem that odd
He said in the article:
When hiring someone new, companies are forced to play in the open market, competing for top talent. But internally, they create opaque and informationally asymmetric compensation structures designed to minimize growth for existing employees to save the company’s bottom line.
So yes, this is totally just how many (most) companies are run. I work in healthcare and have faced similar issues, where someone I hired as a new grad who accumulated 5 years of experience with me would be making $20K less than someone I just hired who had 5 years of experience somewhere else. I always had some words for anyone who tried to talk to me about retention rates
Looks like this is happening in Denmark, which has different laws than the US's "fair use."
I also can't tell. Maybe both
they've either done or attempted most of that list
Source: Trust me bro
protist
joined 1 year ago