sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 58 points 8 months ago

Are you one of those fabled pure Linux virgins the prophecies speak of? Untainted by Microsofts corruption? Or are you a decadent MacOS slut looking to debase yourself even further?

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 9 points 8 months ago

Hardened Colombian Shia Lebouf!

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 19 points 8 months ago

If you don't need power then why not buy old laptops? Plenty of companies around that sell corporate laptops 5+ years old that of course still work fine. Also gives bonus points for reuse and thus reducing ewaste instead of adding to it.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com -5 points 8 months ago

What would you recommend then in the countryside for a family of 5 or more with ample snow in the winter and lots of gravel roads? That can accommodate taking the kids to soccer and to/from school no matter the road conditions? As well as be used to go ski and other car based vacations like going to a beach resort/camping for a week. All of the above being very normal requirements for a family car in at least the Nordics.

A normal station wagon type generally has too low ground clearance but there are exceptions like the cross country models of Volvos. They also only have 5 seats so they just barely fit the family with no additional friends tagging along, and very few can handle double child seats without dropping down to max 4 people. For older kids then yeah it works well, if you don't need the ground clearance, and you can pack on the roof if the trunk isn't big enough.

A large pickup truck has issues with being usable for the vacation stuff. Sure you can pack on the flatbed and there are "houses" to give it cover but it's hardly smooth, and they're even larger and more expensive than a SUV.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 0 points 8 months ago

EU favoritism of Microsoft? The same EU that fined Internet Explorer basically out of existence?

If anything it's Microsofts much savvier handling of their AI policies that make them less of a target. Copilot is very clear that they aren't entitled to use your data to train the base model, which is in stark contrast to OpenAIs agreement and Googles which basically say that anything entered into them is fair game for them to use to train.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 1 points 8 months ago

Amen, can't fix everything or one.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 1 points 8 months ago

As a sales guy myself by training and tech sales by profession that sounds very much like there are some very fucked incentive structures at play that need to be addressed. If they're only monitored on number of deals closed then you get shit like that trying to meet targets and get the bonus that is extremely standard in the sales profession and account for a large share of the yearly salary. If they're measured on profitability then you wouldn't see that, they'd drop stingy clients themselves for wasting their time. Another solution I've seen is having a larger bonus for customer satisfaction and renewals / growing the contract but that only really works out if your sales also doubles as account managers.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah my take away there is if that's the tech level of your sales guys you need to have a tech sales role and a strict ban on the pure sales people even attempting talking tech. Sales should be talking business and business needs that the solution can adress.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah exactly, if they have decent APIs or you can scissor out the content via iframes or something. Not really a web developer so I probably ain't makin' sense.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 3 points 8 months ago

Doesn't sound like it's own "product" to be honest. I'd probably look at an alternative presentation layer that can present what's in Jellyfin and also supports being the presentation layer for the top solutions for books, comics etc. If nothing like that exists I think there are people that would be interested in a unified media presenter. It doesn't even need to actually play the media, just link to it.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 0 points 8 months ago

Valid point. Unlike other billionaires with public companies connected to them Taylor Swift's net worth is here value up until this point, what she has generated. There is no pricing in of future potential like what made the Tesla and Nvidia stock absolutely explode (and by that their respective stakeholders net worth). I hadn't thought of that.

[-] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sure, if we're talking work as in compensation per hour. But we aren't here. She's a product (as in Taylor Swift the artist is, not Taylor Swift the person naturally) and thus can be sold in quantities only limited by the amount of people on our planet that can afford to buy her music/merch/tickets etc. For me as a consultant to make a billion just isn't possible, but if I start a company selling something which isn't limited like the amount of hours in a day then... Yeah no, I don't have it in me to become a billionaire. But you get the picture I hope.

To hammer it home, she's globally recognizeable as I'd say the most famous active musician right now. And she has been in the top 10 for a long while. That kind of fame begets net worth faster than just about any CEO gig ever will.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ninjan

joined 1 year ago