sorted by: new top controversial old
Google Removes App That Helps People Boycott Pro-Israel Companies in c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] kewko@lemdro.id 12 points 10 months ago

Holy shit save that wisdom for your children

I was contacted by a recruiter, but I can't find anything on the company. in c/programming@beehaw.org
[-] kewko@lemdro.id 2 points 10 months ago

It really is a good one, entertaining and educational

I was contacted by a recruiter, but I can't find anything on the company. in c/programming@beehaw.org
[-] kewko@lemdro.id 2 points 10 months ago

https://youtu.be/XpkNGMSWbYk brings to memory. Not sure why (yes I'm commenting on my comment for dramatic effect)

I was contacted by a recruiter, but I can't find anything on the company. in c/programming@beehaw.org
[-] kewko@lemdro.id 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sure sounds a bit dodge, but not having an online footprint is a good strategy for some companies.

This comment has been marked as spam

Its okay it was just a typo in c/memes@sopuli.xyz
Bad Bots Account for 73% of Internet Traffic: Analysis in c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] kewko@lemdro.id 6 points 10 months ago

Who's a bad bot?

New Zealand scraps world-first smoking ‘generation ban’ to fund tax cuts in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
[-] kewko@lemdro.id 1 points 10 months ago

Just out of curiousity have you ever seen liquid sold at $65/10ml? I usually pay 50-100x less than that

Here's what's happening to ad blockers in Google Chrome in c/technology@lemmy.ml
[-] kewko@lemdro.id 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Firefox safe browsing API is also from Google

It is, however it doesn't send data to google. Browser receives the list of all unsafe pages and checks against it locally

Here's what's happening to ad blockers in Google Chrome in c/technology@lemmy.ml
[-] kewko@lemdro.id 3 points 10 months ago

To be clear Google has no direct way to force FF to do shit. The reason Google is implementing v3 is to disrupt adblocking (by dropping v2 APIs) the reason Mozilla is supporting v3 is to make life easier for extension Devs. They don't have to comply with same restrictions

Here's what's happening to ad blockers in Google Chrome in c/technology@lemmy.ml
[-] kewko@lemdro.id 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Implemeting support for v3 is not the same as dropping web request blocking API from v2... Google pays to Mozilla for service they provide having them as default search engine - it's not a sponsorship...

Saying that, I've done some more recent research and Google has already softened their stance on requests blocking with current manifesto proposal of up to 5k dynamic rules with a proposal to extend up to 30k being popular.Sources: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/improvements-to-content-filtering-in-manifest-v3/ proposal: https://github.com/w3c/webextensions/issues/319#issuecomment-1682073791

Here's what's happening to ad blockers in Google Chrome in c/technology@lemmy.ml
[-] kewko@lemdro.id -4 points 10 months ago

What is the point of your comment? Everybody and their grandmother (including the bycicles and the EU) understands the point of Google's changes. There's no need to prove shit. Chrome is a choice, doesn't come on any platforms as default (that support extensions). Personally I changed back to FF when they first announced these changes a few years back.

On the bright side, I didn't kill my BLtouch. in c/3dprinting@lemmy.world
[-] kewko@lemdro.id -4 points 10 months ago

Almost as if zeroing is a sensitive process that should be done slowly 🤔

view more: next ›

kewko

joined 1 year ago