sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago

These German carmakers can buy a monthly subscription to me giving a fuck.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

r/I'm14andThisIsTRUE

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

🎶 "I'm a connnnnn mann, or maybe I'm a god? Zoomin‘ round the planet, in my hyper loopin‘ pod..." 🎶

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago

Its subtle, but the tone of that article's coverage actually sucks... Is futurism a piece of shit?

What a waste of my tax dollars by the DOJ to try to recover spotify´s money for a broken system that they left open and are honestly probably exploiting themselves in parallel to inflate engagement numbers and take streams away from legit artists that they have to play. Remember, they want you in their app, they don't give a shit about actual music. If you'll just listen to random boops, they save cost in the middle. Not where I want the justice systems effort to go.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

What's the last "bombshell scandal that would ruin a company" that actually ruined a company?

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You wouldn't download a collection of all the art and knowledge ever documented in the entire history of the known universe...

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Anything about his general philosophy though... Decent person?

I'm just weary these days of people quietly pushing odd agendas in innocuous ways in unrelated content, so I like to walk into a new person with a more detailed intro from someone who is already a fan. Otherwise you get things like, "This is the way to make the best brownies for a summer picnic. We'll go through the recipe step by step and you'll love these brownies! I love Summer, it's a great time for picnics and also a great time to not get vaccinated and do a January 6th because what is a woman and CRT!"

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Who is this YouTuber? Good person generally?

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

So funny that all the musk brigaders on here, in full force, can only collectively muster 4 downvotes...

You are the wet farts of humanity.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

1000%, we need to demand minimum functionality or stop perpetuating these fucking things by purchasing flawed products from flawed companies.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

"Tired of having all of that pesky blood INSIDE your body... YUCK!!!"

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You just risk staying in limbo if not direct/literal effigy IMO... All young males in general have the earned reputation of typically being oblivious of expressed female romantic advances (just search Reddit, you'll see 300 posts speaking to this per day). On top of that general difficulty, you have the compounding factor of their atypical mental processing.

So do what you think is right. Hope it works out for you both.

2
submitted 2 months ago by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
18
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

I heard a person call into a show the other day, voice only, and talk about some poor working conditions at a factory. Made me think about how it would probably be so easy for nefarious bosses to be able to identify that person through voice recognition SW with all of the data that comes from us looking directly into cameras and speaking clearly in modern workplace meetings.

Do "anonymous" callers need to start using voice modulation software for these kinds of calls in the modern world?

155
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/reddit@lemmy.world

As a little background, I didn't actively use Reddit for months following the blackout. I still barely stop in over there and if I do I'm never logged in our contributing to the communities there (where I was previously a daily poster/commenter).

Just bringing up a point that I'm not sure I'd seen anyone discussing directly over here; the general sentiment and quality of posted information on Reddit has become tangibly worse in multiple ways (I think coinciding with this group, us, leaving).

Now don't get me wrong, Reddit sucked in many ways and for long before the migrations to Lemmy, but there is a noticeable difference in a few key areas:

  1. Less skepticism in replies

  2. Less sourcing of information in posts and replies

  3. Less counter positions expressed generally

  4. If there is a decent reply, you have to scroll much further down to find it

  5. Less plain labeling of obvious bullshit

Many of us used to introduce counter viewpoints or clarifying information into posts, with sources. That functionally worked as a roadblock to stall the quickly building momentum of disinformation/misinformation. Those roadblocks often feel absent over there now, IMO.

Not saying we hold a responsibility to go back there or that we were saving lives before, but the difference is very apparent to me - Have you seen it? Any examples?

207
submitted 5 months ago by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
43
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Assuming to artificially secure people with new memberships through their first 4-6 weeks to establish a habit through the first billing cycle. Is this a known thing?

0
submitted 1 year ago by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

So obviously we're all on Lemmy for a complicated combination of reasons, but we all likely share some common ground, namely...

  • need for privacy
  • need to own/control/access the data we produce
  • healthy skepticism about the trustworthiness of for-profit corporations, in general

So if we don't want meta to know even innocuous things; like how many times/when we message our grandma, and we don't google to know when we're searching for remedies to a rash, and we don't want reddit to... Well we just don't want reddit - we don't want them to profit from or weaponize that data against us in a myriad ways.

We also don't want them artificially removing features and creating tiered layers of service/value hidden behind a paywall (I understand this is very present in the some of the commercially available DNA services).

So that brings me to DNA testing services. Since they started to emerge in the mainstream they were immediately an interesting, exciting novelty and I also knew it was data I wouldn't feel safe trusting with a for-profit org - with broken systems like law enforcement and health insurers on speed dial and just salivating for the goodies they collect.

So all that considered, any groups that provide this type of service that you do trust/use, and why?

1

Hey all, I used to use a to do app and can't remember name, it was very distinct though, please help!

  • visual aesthetic was of an IRL open paper journal (distinct touch: out had a coffee stain on upper corner of the paper)
  • extremely simple, text input on lines and a checkbox to complete (animation of pen crossing by hand would play IIRC)
  • only option besides complete/delete was to move to "tomorrow". Then when you flipped the page (animation) you'd see the next day's tasks.
  • only looked at today and tomorrow in favor of simplicity
  • For some reason, I want to think it was just called "today" or "tomorrow".

Any ideas?

view more: next ›

Snapz

joined 1 year ago