sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

Most likely actually non profitable. With crapton of Chinese cash, they can keep paying studios more of a cut than Steam, giveaway games, pay for exclusivity. Their goal right now isn't to make money, but to take market share

[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

No, you don't get it. You know, there's all these details and context and it's so much more complicated than that. To put it the way you did is just so simplistic and misses the point. /s

[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago

Will Smith & Jada Pinkett

[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

Wow. I apologize for the confusion. I absolutely do not believe these two situations are comparable. My bad.

[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Is it amoral? Yes, for sure 100%. But as a global community, we barely punish those who engage in this kind of tactic, and when we do, it's for some kind of political theater. More Palestinian civilians will die in this conflict by a factor, if you're going to criticize Hamas for this, I'd like to see the same standard applied to IDF.

[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

Israel continues to expand their occupation of Palestinian land, though. Do you think Palestinians in Gaza have no stake in the well-being of other Palestinians in East Jerusalem and the West Bank?

[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 20 points 11 months ago

Do you consider Hamas the aggressor in the overall context of the Israel- Palestinian conflict?

[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

If France was in support, it wouldn't have been called the Coalition of the Willing since the war would've been approved by the UN. It was only named that since it was an illegal aggression against another country by the international standards, hence the need to get other countries involved to legitimize it.

[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

I'm really not exactly sure what qualifies, but the existence of an emergent system so has to be there. Does fungus communication give rise to a system that can build some kind of memory and refer to it to develop more complex behavior? If not, then it's lacking the level of complexity to be considered consciousness. (But that's just where I personally draw the line)

Eusociality has its own context. It's possible for a hive to show complex organized behavior, but so would an infinite paperclip machine if it was to consist of a swarm of collector drones. A myriad of units with a set of pre-determined instructions can have complex organizations, which still wouldn't qualify as consciousness.

Now, the brain scenario would definitely count since it consists of the necessary "hardware" to start generating its own abstract contextual model of its experiences.

[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Honestly, that what businesses want because it checks off a box in their cyber insurance application. They don't care as long as their ass is covered.

[-] Poteryashka@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

The point of emerging systems is that they tend to be more than just a sum of their parts:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gestalt

view more: next ›

Poteryashka

joined 1 year ago