sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

To be clear, it’s encrypted*.

* If you enable it

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 weeks ago

Cloud connected cars are essentially what happens when companies refuse to admit smart phones are superior for 99% of the stuff they want their car to do, and the other 1% is subscription bullshit.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly would be hard to do. There a perfectly legitimate and everyday uses for pretty much everything used in fingerprinting. Taking them away or obscuring them in one way or another would break so much.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago

TLDR for anyone reading: Do not do this!

There is a very well laid out reason by @becausechemistry@lemm.ee in this thread, but suffice to say this is dangerous to an extreme and is not worth the risk to save a little money.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly for hiking I’d suggest a power bank with solar charge capability. One thing to charge them all.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, I can think of many ideal places for such things. Intersections for instance, where cars will be wanting to slow down or come to a stop regardless. Speed limit changes, where you want cars to slow down. Even in place of speed bumps, assuming you can get enough of a drag on the car to effect a slow down.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

I was gonna tell you a gay joke, butt fuck it.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Those aren’t always a fit for everywhere. And getting energy from one place to another is an unsolved issue. Just because one option is cheaper than others doesn’t mean that particular option is the better choice. Diversity is very important.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

That would kneecap public access to anything. Their API is what runs their site, requiring auth for everything would essentially break Reddit for anyone not logged in.

That would kill new accounts. No one would know what was being talked about before onboarding, but without that information, what would their motivation be for onboarding?

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It depends. Is this energy the same energy that is already being burned?

Looking at an extremely simple example: Solar powered calculators (the real ones). They harness light from the light bulbs in a room which would be otherwise dark. The only time they are harnessing that power, is when the light is on. They add no extra draw to the light, they are 100% passive. The only time you’d really have to take into consideration how green that power is (explicitly for the calculator) is if you are turning on that light explicitly to power the calculator.

If the tech being talked about is just harnessing the “junk energy” of the vehicles in their normal operation, this would be 100% green energy. If it is adding a load, it is 100% dirty when powered by an ICE. If it’s somewhere in the middle… I hope you get my point.

You’re also ignoring the fact that not all vehicles are ICE.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Assume it is not. If you’re asking an LLM for information you don’t understand, you’re going to have a bad time. It’s not a learning tool, and using it as such is a terrible idea.

If you want to use it for search, don’t just take it at face value. Click into its sources, and verify the information.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Eh

If I program something to always reply “2” when you ask it “how many [thing] in [thing]?” It’s not really good at counting. Could it be good? Sure. But that’s not what it was designed to do.

Similarly, LLMs were not designed to count things. So it’s unsurprising when they get such an answer wrong.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

KairuByte

joined 1 year ago