sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 3 points 9 months ago

Wow. Seems like I will never stop learning new things about Lua.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

~~This isn't Lua code, Lua requires commas as separators for table items.~~

EDIT: Retracted, it seems like Lua allows this madness

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago

I hope it's going to be used instead of machine learning. Seems much more correct, secure and efficient to me.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 5 points 10 months ago

Same here. Sounds pretty sustainable to me!

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Of course the most productive comment is the least upvoted one. EDIT: After thinking about it, maybe it's best to add an explanation to bare links.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago

Are you beginning to see things more clearly now?

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's double speak. The translation is "We are evil and if you say something about what you see, we will silence you.".

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 6 points 11 months ago

I've recently come to appreciate the "refactor the code while you write it" and "keep possible future changes in mind" ideas more and more. I think it really increases the probability that the system can live on instead of becoming obsolete.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 16 points 11 months ago

Actually one of the few languages you can learn in its completeness in less than a day, so I wouldn't really say it's "hard to understand". More like hard to read and understands programs written in it.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Sure, it's advantageous in the short-term. I think this is where we misunderstand each other. What I'm trying to say is that under normal circumstances, individuals aren't maximizing their output. They are just living as part of the community, following the unwritten rules and benefiting from that. (In the prisoner's dilemma, this would be choice A).

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If this is how everyone would act in their daily life, you would see crime, theft and abuse on an unimaginable level. No, people don't always do what benefits them "at every individual point". We are social creatures, acting as a community where the individuals benefit from working together. Although this has been successfully undermined by capitalism and other hierarchies.

This whole concept is also called, the Prisoner's Dilemma, one of my favorite thought experiments because it shows how being rational can result in everyone being worse off.

[-] Jummit@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. The "tragedy of the commons" is a myth.

Without any limits, individual cattle owners have an incentive to overgraze the land, destroying its value to everybody.

This is factually false, because the land will be destroyed and individuals don't benefit, not even in the short term. Commons work great (see open source software), but capitalism and power structures abuse and destroy them for short-term profit.

10
submitted 1 year ago by Jummit@lemmy.one to c/programming@beehaw.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.one/post/2707178

An interesting blog post that reflects some ideas I've been thinking about lately.

Since nothing close to the environment described in the article has entered the mainstream since ten years, it's safe to say that it's probably too hard or maybe too inconvenient.

I'd still like programming to go into this general direction, our tooling is really limited in comparison with how complex software has become.

11

An interesting blog post that reflects some ideas I've been thinking about lately.

Since nothing close to the environment described in the article has entered the mainstream since ten years, it's safe to say that it's probably too hard or maybe too inconvenient.

I'd still like programming to go into this general direction, our tooling is really limited in comparison with how complex software has become.

view more: next ›

Jummit

joined 1 year ago