Well... that's not the worst thing that happened to a class yesterday...
"Your brakes operation will resume after this 10s ad"
Are we fat-shaming cars now?
You are assuming here that I know what I want. What if there is no obviously correct answer, and even in the Everett branch that generates the optimal content for the file I'll still think it can be improved and tell it to destroy the universe?
What if there is no correct answer?
I just use this:
#!/bin/bash
keep_generating=1
while [[ $keep_generating == 1 ]]; do
dd if=/dev/random of=$1 bs=1 count=$2 status=none
echo Contents of $1 are:
cat $1
echo
read -p "Try generating again? " -s -n1 answer
while true; do
case $answer in
[Yy] )
echo
break
;;
[Nn] )
keep_generating=0
break
;;
*)
esac
read -s -n1 answer
done
done
Poe's law states that no tip off is going to be good enough to clue everyone.
You have been warned but you needed proof
You hanged some lighting on the roof
The spirit of the holiday overthrew you
You climbed up on a kitchen chain
You plugged the cord. It zapped your hair
And from your lips you trembled Hallelujah
Sorry, but no thanks. If I wanted to see a disappointment I'd just get a mirror.
Or maybe they just don't want to take the risk? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/29/five-people-killed-in-south-east-texas-shooting-cleveland