Well... that's not the worst thing that happened to a class yesterday...

"Your brakes operation will resume after this 10s ad"

Are we fat-shaming cars now?

You are assuming here that I know what I want. What if there is no obviously correct answer, and even in the Everett branch that generates the optimal content for the file I'll still think it can be improved and tell it to destroy the universe?

What if there is no correct answer?

I just use this:

#!/bin/bash

keep_generating=1
while [[ $keep_generating == 1 ]]; do
    dd if=/dev/random of=$1 bs=1 count=$2 status=none
    echo Contents of $1 are:
    cat $1
    echo
    read -p "Try generating again? " -s -n1 answer
    while true; do
        case $answer in
            [Yy] )
                echo
                break
                ;;
            [Nn] )
                keep_generating=0
                break
                ;;
            *)
        esac
        read -s -n1 answer
    done
done

Poe's law states that no tip off is going to be good enough to clue everyone.

Here you go: https://onlyfans.com/ir1xk8r013d7u

You have been warned but you needed proof
You hanged some lighting on the roof
The spirit of the holiday overthrew you
You climbed up on a kitchen chain
You plugged the cord. It zapped your hair
And from your lips you trembled Hallelujah

Sorry, but no thanks. If I wanted to see a disappointment I'd just get a mirror.

Or maybe they just don't want to take the risk? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/29/five-people-killed-in-south-east-texas-shooting-cleveland