59
submitted 1 year ago by misk@lemm.ee to c/space@beehaw.org
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cybrpwca@beehaw.org 28 points 1 year ago

Good news: smaller pieces burn up much easier in the atmosphere, so in the case of an actual asteroid deflection it's still a net gain.

Bad news: more potential navigation hazards.

I think that's a fair trade.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Also, dispersing the boulders early enough means that most of them would miss Earth anyway.

I wouldn't really consider them navigation hazards, space is really big and boulders are really small. You'd have to aim a probe really precisely at one in order to hit it.

[-] Declamatie@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

We won't have to use this defense mechanism very often anyway. Fingers crossed.

[-] RoboRay@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, it is still better to get hit with a dozen Hiroshima-nuke-scale impacts than a single dinosaur-killer-scale impact.

Statistically, the majority of them should hit ocean anyway.

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
59 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7242 readers
26 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS