India could be behind killing of Canadian Sikh - Trudeau (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 1 year ago by Pips@lemmy.film to c/world@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the Indian government could be behind the fatal shooting of Canadian Sikh leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar.

Mr Nijjar was shot dead outside of a Sikh temple on 18 June in British Columbia (BC).

Mr Trudeau said Canadian intelligence has identified a credible link between his death and the Indian state.

He raised the issue with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the recent G20 summit, he said.

Mr Nijjar was a prominent Sikh leader in the province of BC and a vocal backer of a separate Khalistani state.

India has previously said he was a terrorist and led a militant separatist group - accusations his supporters call "unfounded".

The original article contains 165 words, the summary contains 113 words. Saved 32%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 4 points 1 year ago

Western companies and governments need to decouple and shun India not build closer connections like they’re trying to.

India is just tomorrows China, best to nip it in the bud before it grows more.

[-] roguemetahuman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Canada should not have given citizenship to a wanted terrorist. Read up and do your own research.

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 0 points 1 year ago

Damn they gave Modi citizenship?

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023

78 points (96.4% liked)

World News

38554 readers

3386 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.