63
submitted 1 year ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/technology@lemmy.ml
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eee@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

oh no, they can no longer sell a phone that's 3 years old, how will they survive?

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

a phone that’s 3 years old

Correct. This article pertains to the three year old iPhone that was discontinued two days ago. You understand that Apple doesn’t just sell base model iPhones for one year, right? They are sold for two additional refresh cycles. So the iPhone 12 was still being officially sold by Apple until two days ago. Just like how the iPhone 13 will continue being sold until next year when the iPhone 16 comes out.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If this is confirmed they will probably need to recall and replace a significant percentage of all the phones they sold ~~3 years ago.~~ in the last 3 years.

Edit: made comment more accurate.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The next question is if these countries will require apple to refund or replace each of these devices.

[-] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

My work phone is one of these I think. The article doesn't really say what, if any implications exist from this radiation. How much electromagnetic radiation could a mobile phone possibly emit?

[-] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[-] Slotos@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They don’t measure emission but body absorption. Body limit is 2 W/kg, limbs limit is 4 W/kg. Apparently only the latter limit is violated.

For meat sacks like us it primarily translates to heat. At frequencies used, this radiation can nudge molecules a bit, which directly translates to heating up. If it was in a hundreds of watts, we’d be approaching microwave ovens territory.

The limits are there because there’s a limit to how much heat a body can efficiently dissipate, and quite a few sources of it. There’s also a concern that localized RF heating can cause cancer, which is not empirically confirmed. I personally care more about a confirmed issue of the nuclear ball in the sky causing one.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/france-demands-apple-pull-iphone-12-due-to-high-rf-radiation-levels/amp/

PS: Totally forgot, just by existing and occasionally eating, you’re generating roughly 1W per kilogram of body mass, probably a bit more.

[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Apple has already announced that they will issue a software update to address this.

The iPhone 12 probably was compliant at release, then software updates increased the emissions for some reason and a retest has shown that it's now above the EU legal limit of 4 watts per kilogram (~5.7 watts it seems). The update will presumably bring that down again, possibly reducing modem performance slightly.

This isn't a real health threat as the legal limit is very conservative. That's a good thing obviously, but iPhone 12 users don't have to be worried for their health in this case :)

[-] harry315@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Nice. Time to buy a used one for a steal

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
63 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

34673 readers
705 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS