229
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kae@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 year ago

This is an overall win. The upward pressure is good for everyone, as phones have passed the meteoric rise of speed. Devices have been able to last far longer than their update cycle for a few years now.

[-] ArtificialLink@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

Cool do the same for the rest.

[-] captainsiscold@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

My thoughts on it: cool, now give it a headphone jack again and I might buy it.

I'm not buying a phone that requires $100 wireless earbud DLC (which honestly feel like just another thing to become e-waste in a few years when the battery gives out).

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

My soundcore wireless headphones have lasted longer than any pair of wired headphones I've ever had. Going on 4 years now and just as good as the day I bought them. They were only $70 too. Not saying you're wrong but there's reasonably priced quality ones out there if you look

[-] darkkite@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

my wired headphones are going strong since 2012

[-] ArtificialLink@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Got a pair of wired headphones from the 90's lol batteries in wireless would long be dead

[-] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Second to soundcore. I got the soundcore life Q10 and love them several years later.

[-] Piers@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Do you spend $70 on your wired headphones though? Or are you comparing the durability of cheap crap wired headphones to decent value budget wireless headphones? I have both a pair of Soundcore wireless headphones and a couple of pairs of wired headphones at home that all cost around the same amount and I'm certain I could smash the Soundcore headphones into tiny pieces using the wired ones and the wired ones would still work fine.

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I spent $30-40 a few times on some wired headphones. This was around 10 or so years ago so, what 50/55 in today money? Maybe more. They'd last me 8 months to a year instead of the 3 or 4 from the cheap ones but eventually the wire at the buds or the aux plug would wear out from being shoved in my pocket, bag, etc. For everyday use I prefer wireless. I have a nice turntable, amp, and speakers for when I want to listen at home. Headphones are exclusively an "on the go" thing for me and my several years old set of BT headphones do the trick just fine

[-] darkkite@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

you can still use an adapter.

I did on my T-Mobile g1. the first android phone

[-] bug@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

I know the removal of established standards that people use is a bad thing, but I don't know why people still pretend wireless headphones are suddenly the only option like this is all a conspiracy to sell planned-obsolescence tech and track everyone via Bluetooth. Adapters might not be ideal in every situation or for every use-case but don't pretend most people can't just leave one attached to the end of their headphones!

[-] captainsiscold@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Fair enough, adapters do exist, but as you point out, there are situations where that is not ideal. On a long flight, for example, where I might want to charge my phone and also listen to something, or (in my case) someone who does some amateur audio engineering work on the side, where having the ability to simply wire in a device to play some audio is a big plus. My biggest problem is that phones from five years ago could do both wireless and wired headphones just fine, no adapters needed. What have we gained as consumers by the loss of one of those options?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 3 points 1 year ago

You realize dlc stands for downloadable content, right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] anonymous_bot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What phone do you have right now?

What would you switch to if it dies?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Honza368@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

It would be cool if they backported the promise. But I don't expect it, honestly.

[-] armrods@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They are not in charge of other oems updates, that's why Play System updates were created (mainline modules)

[-] ArtificialLink@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I was talking about pixels man. Lol

[-] Welp_im_damned@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

I mean they did that with the og pixel. Idk why they wouldn't do that with the 6 and 7?

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 29 points 1 year ago

Yes please do the bare minimum

[-] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 17 points 1 year ago

Wait I'm confused are they going to up it to 8 years now for the 8th gen or is the number of years still up to debate? Either way not bad especially if they keep their current practices of being repairable and third party os friendly

[-] foo@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago
[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Instructions unclear. Browser stuck in Lemmy.

[-] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah my fault kinda skimmed it

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One can dream. Also, given the upcoming EU regulations around replaceable batteries, they may have some work done around this area too. That would be essential for a device with long term support.

[-] spacedogroy@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago

Would have loved to see this for my 4A but glad they're looking to extend the support window moving forward. Many phones now are powerful enough to go years past their obsolescence date and chucking them away is just e-waste.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Still have a 3a going strong. And I bought it as soon as it came out

[-] Mio@feddit.nu 10 points 1 year ago

Only 3 years of OS updates, then you need a new phone. Give 5 years directly so you can start thinking about competing with iOS. What is the problem? They have control of the software and the hardware like Apple.

[-] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

The 'problem' is that supporting 'old' hardware won't net them the same high profit margins to which they've grown accustomed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Custom roms have proven that Pixels could have lasted about an extra 1-2 more android versions before performance really caught up. The Pixel 2 could run Android 13, albeit a bit buggier since it's unofficial. My only guess would be costly reasons for Google to further support those devices longer at the time.

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

This article is garbage. It never says what the expected change even is. Like is it 5 years? Idk since it never says.

[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

It's pretty embarrassing that Google got outdone by Samsung on the update front. Mid range Samsungs getting more Android version updates than flagship Google Pixel devices should never happen. Google matching or exceeding them is the minimum of what should be expected.

Also the first few generations of tensor just being a rebadged Exynos processor has hit their reputation hard. Everyday users don't know what chip is in their phone, but they do know that cell reception and thermals have gotten worse since the change.

[-] IdleSheep@lemdro.id 5 points 1 year ago

With how terrible my P7P update experience has been (literally every update has made the phone buggier and more unstable) I'm no longer sure if this is a good thing or not. Maybe if they fix their insane QA issues.

[-] gvasco@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago
[-] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I got my phone through my carrier. Unbeknownst to me at the time, carrier provided phones have locked bootloaders so you can't install grapheneOS on them, or if you can, I haven't found a guide to reliably do so. The phone was $800 off through the carrier so I can't complain too much, but I would have got it straight from Google if I had known prior to buying that you can't install grapheneOS on it.

[-] gvasco@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

All modern phones come with a locked bootloader. This is to protect the OS and the User data, preventing anyone with physical access to the devixe from reseting the device and installing their own software without permissikn. I had to unlock mine on my 1+ 7P before installing /e/OS. It might just be that carrier locked phones might need something extra to unlock them not sure.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Wish I could unlock my Verizon Pixel 7 Pro's bootloader so I can put something less robust on it.

My Pixel 5 was going strong until it landed face down on some granite.

[-] alphapuggle@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

#1 reason I'll never buy anything Verizon. Had to prematurely get rid of phones that could've lasted years more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Doesn't mean much with how bad the QA and overall lifespan of Pixel devices have been unfortunately. Hopefully better this time but hard to want to put money in when the previous generations all had such issues and bad QC.

Extending warranty for the 5As then handing out equally defective devices is a pain. I'm on my 3rd one and I'm really not planning on it surviving over a year since none of the others did and when they died I was sitting down using the phone.

Only thing keeping me on them is GrapheneOS, too difficult to go back after getting a taste of it lol

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I still have a 3a, never had an issue... I might have been lucky

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
229 points (94.9% liked)

Android

17409 readers
168 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS