100

Kim Dotcom to be extradited to the US (www.bbc.com)

submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Fireship said this guy only costed Hollywood like 500m in "potential revenue" over the course of Megaupload's existence which is pretty low compared to the accusations hurled at piratebay which is still active to this day.

The rumor is the FBI only went after him when he tried to setup Mega for music (essentially what Spotify does right now) with a guaranteed 90% profit split for artists. So not even because Mega was popular for pirated content, but because he was super close to imploding the poor (and I think only 3) multibillion dollar record labels.

[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 5 points 1 month ago

We really need a product like that for film actually.

[-] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 month ago

Maybe I'm just completely ignorant of law, but how/why can he be extradited to a foreign country in this manner? Did he previously reside in and operate out of the US?

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 31 points 1 month ago

He made US companies lose money, while making money himself. Thats all they need.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 24 points 1 month ago

Not even that, the service he operated might have been used such that US companies might have missed out on potential revenue.

That's it.

[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 5 points 1 month ago

Ironically, companies made revenue using megaupload in the past.

I recall getting first party .exes from megaupload prior to the huge Google Cloud push.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 28 points 1 month ago

NZ has an extradition treaty with the the US.

Apparently potential copyright infringement is extradition worthy

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Many countries have extradition agreements.

Y’know those spam calls you get? Where they try to say they are the government? The reason they get away with that is that your country doesn’t have an extradition agreement with their country.

That’s a drastic oversimplification but it’s still true

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Nope. The US just has that much influence.

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We essentially control Australia, it's fucking weird.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You know countries with extradition agreements can request extraditions in the other direction, as well?

If an american does a crime in Australia, but makes it back to the states, Australias government can also go "yeah so uuuh that guy killed a dude over here, gonna need him back for trial".

It's what makes it less likely people will just do crime all over other countries and then return home to escape punishment.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

So if I seed a bunch of Australian media to a ratio of 10,000, Uncle Sam can ship me off to Australia to be tried for crimes where my Constitutional rights don't apply?

Cool.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Technically yes.

But I wasn't commenting on whether this given situation, or whether modern copyright laws, are reasonable.

In this case the extradition is extending the reach of shitty laws, but that is not an arguement against extraditions being a thing.

They are a good thing. They allow for laws to reach across borders, because otherwise a state of anarchy would exist between countries, where all crime would be fair game, as long as you only victimized foreigners. That would be extremely fucked.

It's why contries like Russia and India have online scam industries, because there exists no international agreement that would enforce some consequences for robbing people on the other side of the world.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

In this case the extradition is extending the reach of shitty laws, but that is not an arguement against extraditions being a thing.

Of course it is. It's why Germany doesn't extradite citizens: You're prosecuted in Germany, instead. Exception are other EU countries which are assumed to have sane laws, also, you have recourse to the ECHR while the US has plenty of people gleefully arguing that punishments can be cruel or unusual, they just can't be both at the same time.

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Right I was speaking about more than just extradition. https://youtu.be/ZOV8UeLkoAw

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Say what you will about ole Kim, but I spent a good chunk of time sailing the seven seas with his assistance.

[-] Arbiter@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

But why is his name Dotcom.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

He changed it, used to be USENET

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Because he’s weird and we are legally allowed to change our names

[-] LemmyRefugee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

If you speak Spanish, check this video: https://youtu.be/oUQ7_PK_pPw

[-] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Because he changed it.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Techbros will deadname you but will change their name to Kim Dotcom

[-] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 month ago

Has Kim been transphobic? Or is this just you generally hating techbros (not that I'd really consider him a techbro tbh)

[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 5 points 1 month ago

Me either.

When I think of techbros I think venture capital, no ethics, and will sell out anyone if the price is right.

[-] PappyWappy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Dude was once the top MW2 player in the world

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Unsure if MechWarrior or Modern Warfare....

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Man I remember when MU went down. I was halfway through a rewatch of Gundam Wing - bad luck aside lol I couldn’t believe it was happening.

[-] hoxbug@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I was at a lan party having a break from the gaming and decided to browse a little bit, the news was blowing up about it.

[-] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The NWO are hard working people..

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

NWO? Brother???

Voodoo Child starts playing

[-] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They meant NWA. What the relevance is, I don't know, but they aren't wrong.

[-] nebulaone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

(☝︎ ՞ਊ ՞)☝︎ "Straight outta Compton

crazy motherfucker named Ice Cube

from a gang called n-- with attitude"

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

WOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Ric Flair's theme plays

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024

100 points (97.2% liked)

World News

38529 readers

2303 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.