228
submitted 1 month ago by Gsus4@mander.xyz to c/world@lemmy.world
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 69 points 1 month ago

Headline is a bit disingenuous as it is the most points (because the total points is higher) but only the second highest percentage (1987 still 1st).

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Thank you for posting this, that was my first assumption reading the headline. Anytime I see numbers without a percentage in a headline, or vis versa, I'm immediately suspicious.

After all, there are 3 types of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 month ago

Well it's also caused the US market to dive, even overnight. Looks like the big correction is finally biting down.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Robinhood killed 24 hour trading. Dip is apparently being bought now that premarket is open. Very sketchy tho.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

I think at this point anyone still on Robinhood knows what they're getting into. If after turning off the buy button you didn't get a big boy broker, that's on you.

[-] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

The other brokers didn't need to turn off the buy button because they didn't extent free credit to anyone with a pulse

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

I think the real Robinhood is rolling in his grave. And his merry men as well, they're all spinning in their collective, fictional graves.

[-] Marsupial6233@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Which ones would you recommend?

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I use Fidelity and Vanguard. Fidelity's trading app is fantastic.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

What's robinhood have to do with the market dunking overnight? I can't fathom any real relation.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It's the largest 24 hour brokerage in the US. There was too much sell volume, that their execution venue had to stop it which is a pretty big deal.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Largest by individual accounts, maybe. No way were enough robinhood users watching Japan's market in the dead ass of the middle of the night to sell off all those billions worth of stocks to make such a dive. Those hits were taken due to institutional sellers.

[-] breckenedge@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Do we know where the sales mostly came from?

Random speculation: Could be banks needing to pull out of the market due to the Fed signaling September rate cuts due to the higher-than-expected unemployment report. This will cause a drop in yield for savings, which would cause people to reduce what they have in those accounts.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Well, they announced a rate hike in Japan, so that would seem to be a more immediate cause.

In fact, there's some analysis that suggests that Japan's rate hike contributes to the dip in the other markets. Evidently it was a thing for people to borrow yen, use that to get other currencies, and then buy stock and sell the stock to repay the loans. Since the yen has climbed 14% versus the USD in the past few days, those loans suddenly became awfully expensive.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 12 points 1 month ago

Random speculation: Could be banks needing to pull out of the market due to the Fed

...

Japan stocks

I mean... it could be. But most foreign stock markets aren't directly tethered to the Fed.

[-] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Directly? No. Heavily? Absolutely.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Probably a Pentium based TI 85 calculator program thing.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most of the money banks "have" they created it themselves (it's called Fractional Reserve Lending and there's a wonderful paper on it by somebody at the Bank Of England called "Money creation in the Modern Economy").

The whole "banks lend out depositors' money" thing hasn't been true since the 80s.

Also nowadays most of the money in leveraged investments comes from the Money Markets (so rich people and pension funds) rather than banks.

That said, your point still stands since a reduction of deposits might impact banks' reserves (basically central banks force them to have the equivalent of about 3-5% of their loans as reserves), it would force a wider retrenchment of their loans, but by itself the impact of that on the entire leveraged investment universe should be limited because they're not the main players in the Money Markets.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago
[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 12 points 1 month ago
[-] gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago
[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

At this point, it's not even that. That's just a blip in the 1000-times leveraged surreal casino economy.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago
[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

When they sell low, we buy high :D

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This, but unironically.

Japanese people are overworked and I'm worried for their health. It's good when they get a break from the economy.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 3 points 1 month ago

I wish I knew how the VIX worked, that shit is going to be up so much today.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Nice call, I checked it and it is already above the levels of the Ukraine war. It's a COVID-level or 2008-level event already.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EVIX/

I think volatility is just a name used for variance of a basket of commodities, stocks, bonds that reflects an added price due to risk/uncertainty.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Can we just stop with the stock bullshit. I want this economy to die so much.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

People are freaked about WW3 breaking out

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Usually war is a way to stop a recession/depression since its so profitable.

The economy has been fucked far longer than the current conflicts that might actually start ww3

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 12 points 1 month ago

It is only profitable for a few in some places. War is not net good for "business"

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Ferrengi rule of acquisition 34. The best rule 34.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sounds like the oligarch commandments.

It's like Hyperneoliberalism:

"Nothing bad ever truly happens, guilt is subjective, nothing is real, everything is allowed, but if you take anything from me, it is the worst possible crime in all of history."

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

In a stagflation scenario war is great for business. Otherwise you have no business at all.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Isn't WW2 the only example of this in practice? (and then only where the war did not reach, like the US or pre-1940 nazi germany)

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Ya it’s a pretty good example since WW2 was a stagflation scenario. It’s exactly the same scenario we are headed into. There’s a lot of similar polarities. Some may even argue that the next world war will break out precisely because of stagflation.

As we descend further and further into economic depression (we’ve been in a recession for years) you’ll see the gears of war begin to spool up.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

One would think we'd have learned to fix this inevitability by now...or is it intentional, to "fix the stagflation"?

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The economy squeezes the proles for every penny they have, inflating the money faster than wages to ensure only the rich can afford to maintain.

Once the proles have been squeezed dry, have a major conflict and help save the failing banks and restore a "golden era" for a time.

Then do it all over again by starting to squeeze the masses.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago

Part of the problem is getting everyone on board. Economic prosperity is a great way to justify keeping a government in charge. Major economic downturns usually cause a change of government and unrest with the government in general. Without a good economy as justification to keep a government in power, many governments turn to "defense" as a reason to stay in power.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Usually war is a way to stop a recession/depression since its so profitable.

When you're selling into a war market, you can make a lot of money. When you're in that war market you tend to lose a lot of your expensive durable capital very quickly, which can get very expensive.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Girl, have you been following THIS WEEK'S news? Like right now is unlike any other time.

War is historically used to pillage other people when times are rough. It doesn't stop a recession; it doubles it and gives it to their opponent.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Stop was a strong word, ill agree. But it is a tool in the arsenal of TPTB when shit turns downward because the economic scam that it is modern capitalism eventually unravels

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 1 points 1 month ago

"currency carry trade" was something that came up in a lot of discussions I saw.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Oh hey look a bunch of sheep - human and electronic - are reacting self destructively for no good reason. Must be any day ending with a 'y.'

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
228 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38529 readers
2303 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS