A Wedding Puts India’s Gilded Age on Lavish Display (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] shadysus@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well that's one way to see it.

The company has attracted controversy for reports of political corruption, cronyism, fraud, financial manipulation, and exploitation of its customers, Indian citizens, and natural resources.[11][119][13][14][120] The chairman of Reliance Industries, Mukesh Ambani, has been described as a plutocrat

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliance_Industries#Criticism_and_controversies

8 subsections for 'Criticism and Controversies'

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

You don’t have a ~$450,000,000 wedding for your kid without committing some major crimes on your way there.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

~$450,000,000 wedding

That's disgusting while half the population live in poverty, It should simply not be allowed to have that much wealth anywhere.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

But I'm told the rich are job creators and the money will trickle down! I'm sure that $450,000,000 will trickle down any century now.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

It’s trickling down to poor people like Justin Bieber and Adele.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The article doesn't go super easy on the family, although it omits the company's abuses:

In 2000, India had nine billionaires, according to Oxfam. Now, India has 200 billionaires, who collectively hold around $1 trillion in wealth, according to Forbes — nearly a quarter of the country’s 2023 gross domestic product.

A recent study about wealth and inequality in India subtitled “The Rise of the Billionaire Raj” found that the total wealth of billionaires has steadily increased from under 5 percent of national income in the 1990s to more than a fifth in 2022.

The Ambani family’s wealth and influence are so unquestioned that even the use of public resources to aid his private festivities can be a source of pride. In March, the pre-wedding function they hosted in Jamnagar, a town in the western state of Gujarat where Reliance’s oil refinery is based, threatened to overwhelm the town’s small domestic airport.

To Ms. Venkatesan, the celebration was about more than the wealthy getting wealthier; she was bothered by what she called the “valorization” of this kind of wealth.
It’s not just the mind-boggling rise of billionaire wealth that is new, but also the way that wealth has created a new kind of royalty in a country well acquainted with maharajahs.
Like yesteryear’s royal families, today’s billionaires are increasingly keeping their wealth within their class — either through dynastic succession or by marriage.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

The rich party away while the world burns...

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

This is an obscene display of wealth

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Oh c’mon! A wedding costing a half billion is just what you do these days!

If you spent less on the avocado toast and bothered to return to the office you could have wedding like, too.

[-] Timely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago

That wedding is nothing but absolutely showoff of wealth

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Ironically so, so tacky. Imagine being on the guest list, "Yo, so I can't make it and please don't let anyone know I was invited. Thanks."

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Non paywall linky:

https://archive.ph/oKUlt

[-] intrepid@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

They got the Mumbai city police to restrict or outright block traffic on some busy streets during the week of the wedding celebrations. The police commissioner describes the event as a 'public event' in his order.

Mumbai is the financial capital of India and its demography consists of one of the biggest metropolitan populations in the world, with everyone from the richest billionaire to the poorest of slum dwellers. The streets and trains are extremely busy and packed to their last square inch even on holidays. And then these filth block off these roads for a week!

Needless to say, ordinary people and business owners are livid. But these scum have so much wealth and even an autocratic government as their servants that they don't care about what others think. It's an obscene display of wealth, corruption, undeserving power and an outright FU to the regular citizens.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024

83 points (90.3% liked)

World News

38529 readers

2303 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.