320
submitted 4 months ago by x4740N@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] li10@feddit.uk 128 points 4 months ago

If my dogs ever tried to kill me, I’d just pin them both down. That’s the benefit of not having insanely powerful dogs.

IMO you shouldn’t have a dog that you can’t physically restrain. Any dog can snap and you need to be able to physically stop them if that happens.

load more comments (90 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 84 points 4 months ago

me not knowing the breed looks them up via DDG

So she was basically mauled by the Demon Dogs from Ghostbusters.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 62 points 4 months ago

and the two registered dogs were safely seized having been contained inside a room, a spokesperson for the Metropolitan police said.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago

If she was unable to control them, she should not have gotten permission to own them in the first place.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 60 points 4 months ago

Definitely think owning dogs should require a license and a test of some sort like driving a vehicle.

Can't control a 120lb dog? Class B license instead of Class A license.

Only allowed to buy dogs under 100lbs.

Don't understand how feeding and training works? No license for you.

Licenses for being able to own non-fixed animals as well. Being able to breed dogs and cats needs to come with way more responsibility as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] liquidparasyte@pawb.social 31 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I wonder if Lemmy will be any more Normal about dogs than snoosite was

Update: prognosis is not looking good

load more comments (34 replies)
[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago

Didn't even need to put the breed in the title, we already know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

Very sorry for the life of this lady.

Shitbulls should be banned.

[-] then_three_more@lemmy.world 40 points 4 months ago

From the article

From 1 February, it became a criminal offence to own the XL bully breed in England and Wales without an exemption certificate. Anyone who owns one of the dogs must have had the animal neutered, have it microchipped and keep it muzzled and on a lead in public, among other restrictions.

So I'm guessing she got them before they were banned and had an exception so she didn't have to have them destroyed.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 45 points 4 months ago

Or didn't and simply flouted the law.

There's a stereotype of people who own those breed(s) for a reason.

[-] keesrif@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

The article did mention them as "registered", so I don't think this applies.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 17 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The woman, who was in her 50s, was pronounced dead at the scene in Cornwall Close, Hornchurch, and the two registered dogs were safely seized having been contained inside a room, a spokesperson for the Metropolitan police said.

A spokesperson for the Met said: “Police were called to Cornwall Close around 1.12pm … to reports of a woman attacked by a dog.

“These were registered XL bully dogs and prior to officers’ arrival had been contained inside a room in the house.

From 1 February, it became a criminal offence to own the XL bully breed in England and Wales without an exemption certificate.

Footage of an XL bully dog attacking members of the public in the street in Birmingham, including a 11-year-old girl who sustained shoulder and arm injuries, prompted an outcry in September.

In November 2021, 10-year-old Jack Lis was mauled to death by a seven-stone XL bully dog called Beast.


The original article contains 344 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Idk if it's the same everywhere but in my experience in America I have came across a huge range of canine breeds owned by a huge range of human breeds (quality of person) and 100% of the time the human was a caring person that loved their dog the breed is unnoticeable. On the other side, when the human is subpar the breed of the dog is more noticeable as an inverse correlation to how shitty the person is.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago

This is the dog equivalent of "guns don't kill people, people kill people."

But without the gun, no one would be killed by the gun.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
320 points (90.6% liked)

World News

38548 readers
3919 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS