[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Democracy in which the bourgeoisie are denied political agency as class relations are in the process of being dissolved. The problem isn't actually democracy, the problem is that in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie (democracy where capitalists are in control) capitalist interests override democracy.

Not that democracy doesn't have problems inherently, but they're pretty minor compared to the problems we are facing.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago

Proletarian democracy

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

They don't, you've fallen for anti-communist disinfo

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago

Hexbear thread dunking on this:


Highlights include

Funny how we constantly get told we support capitalist Russia, yet they never actually provide evidence for that.

I'm not surprised tho as lying about communists seems to be second nature to Western bootlickers


i love how that dude makes an absolutely ridiculous assumption, as i've never seen a "tankie" deny that current russia is reactionary as fuck, but since he's saying Bad Thing about The Tankies everyone just goes "hmm yea those tankies amirite? smh"

liberals are fucking idiots, they never have any idea of what they're actually talking about and just throw around concepts and categories with the level of understanding of a monkey playing with a power tool


"We support the Russian Federation's opposition to US imperialism. We oppose their reactionary government including the state suppression of lgbtq+ people, minority nationalities and ethnic groups, etc. Using these issues as cudgels for US/NATO imperialism hurts all people in Russia, including oppressed minorities, and undermines the progressive nature of those liberation struggles in that country."

"Smdh tankies are pro-russia homophobes"

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 days ago

There’s nothing stopping people in the lower classes from investing.


[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Any sources there or do you just lie for fun?

Edit: an article on this kind of behavior:https://redsails.org/false-witnesses/

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 48 points 5 days ago

Incredible self own

submitted 2 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
submitted 3 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
submitted 4 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Press Statement by Spokesman for DPRK Ministry of National Defence Pyongyang, December 2 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Ministry of National Defence of the DPRK released the following press statement "Any attack on space asset of the DPRK will be deemed declaration of war against it" on Saturday:

The brigandish nature of the U.S., which regards it as its main lever for realizing its hegemonic wild ambition to commit outrageous and unlawful military intervention against sovereign countries, has been brought to light more clearly, occasioned by the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite launch.

An official concerned of the U.S. Space Command recently spouted rubbish hinting at a military attack on the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite, saying that the U.S. can decrease the enemy country's outer space operation capabilities by employing diverse "reversible and irreversible methods".

American military affairs experts comment that the U.S. Space Force can physically destroy not only opponent's satellite and satellite earth station but also get rid of enemy state's space force through jamming and virus-using cyber attack.

The U.S. Space Force's deplorable hostility toward the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite can never be overlooked as it is just a challenge to the sovereignty of the DPRK, and more exactly, a declaration war against it.

Article 8 of the "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies", the main international outer space treaty, stipulates that any object launched into outer space definitely falls under the jurisdiction of the launcher state and the ownership of it never changes no matter it remains in outer space or returned to the earth.

This means that the reconnaissance satellite "Malligyong-1" is a part of the territory of the DPRK where its sovereignty is exercised.

Furthermore, reconnaissance satellite is not regarded as a space weapon by international law for its technical features aimed at observation.

If the reconnaissance satellite of the DPRK is regarded by the U.S. as a "military threat" that must be gotten rid of, countless spy satellites of the U.S. flying above the Korean peninsula region every day, exclusively tasked with monitoring the major strategic spots of the DPRK, should be deemed the primary targets to be destroyed by the armed forces of the DPRK.

By openly unveiling its aggression scheme to mount a military attack on a space asset of other sovereign country, a part of its properties and territory, the U.S. has proved itself its true colors as the chief culprit of evils seeking to realize its wild ambition for dominating the world by turning outer space, common wealth of humankind, into a theater of war.

It is the mission of the armed forces of the DPRK, specified by its constitution and other laws, to exercise their war deterrent to protect the state sovereignty and territorial integrity in case a lethal military attack is carried out against the country's strategic assets or it is judged that such attack is imminent.

In case the U.S. tries to violate the legitimate territory of a sovereign state by weaponizing the latest technologies illegally and unjustly, the DPRK will consider taking responsive action measures for self-defence to undermine or destroy the viability of the U.S. spy satellites by exercising its legitimate rights vested by international and domestic laws. -0- www.kcna.kp (Juche112.12.2.)

submitted 4 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
submitted 5 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
submitted 5 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world
[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 83 points 5 months ago

It is incel/manosphere shit

submitted 6 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 53 points 6 months ago

Might want to add a /s tag there or something, poe's law

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 142 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Feel free to report antisemitic comments, but antizionism isn't antisemitism and acting like it is is antisemitic and will net you a ban starting once this comment is posted.

Reporting borderline stuff will not get you banned but as someone who had family at auschwitz I'm tired of blatant antisemitism in defense of a settler colonialist apartheid regime.

Hall of shame:


[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 54 points 6 months ago

What? From union buster segregationist eulogizing Joe?

submitted 8 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Some U.S. officials are frustrated at the pace of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which has gained less than 100 square miles of territory.

submitted 8 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world

Some U.S. officials are frustrated at the pace of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which has gained less than 100 square miles of territory.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 68 points 8 months ago

Oh look an anti-vegan circlejerk.

Do the "how do you know someone's vegan? They'll tell you" joke next. I promise it doesn't come off as insecure.

No comment (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 8 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
Theory for Dronies (i.imgur.com)
submitted 8 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›


joined 8 months ago