sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 hours ago

It’s focused after they realize what is effective.

No, it wasn't. Have you read any of the first hand accounts of the BPP?

But at this point I feel like you intentionally missing the point.

The point of movements is to accomplish things. Solarpunk isn't a movement if there is no theory of change.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Effective political action is focused and intentional. The BPP had a plan. There is no central solarpunk organ for democratic decision making, there is no party program. They have nothing that would make them an effective org.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Idk why you think it has to have theory or praxis to be a movement.

If it doesn't have ideas and it isn't testing those ideas through social practice it isn't a movement?

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

owning a house and having people pay you money so they can live there is criminal”

The system that makes housing operate that way is criminal. Housing should not be a commodity

but if you go straight to some sort of off-the-wall ideology and you’re very loud about it without discussing the nuances

Honestly in most discussions I find the communists to be the more nuanced of the bunch.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

You sound like you need a peasant's revolution

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Found the idle rent seeker, or worse, a bootlicker for idle rent seekers.

There is a reason why capitalists and socialists both hate landlords, they are a relic of feudalism.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Generally the comments I get are when I put in effort to my appearance. Putting together a nice outfit, accessorizing, doing something with my hair, putting on a good perfume for the vibe, that sort of thing.

It gives me confidence and a mixture of that + demonstrating thought/intentionality is what I think is what is hot to folks. At least that is my perspective on it when admiring other femmes. I feel like it is something anyone can do in their own way?

I get that men might be afraid of like, being called gay for putting effort into their appearance, but honestly just not having a thin skin is an attractive feature in someone.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

Okay, do you think people have the right to get angry at problems they have in their life due to an incredibly violent and inefficient system?

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

Okay so you want a hot war between Russia and NATO and you think that would be less violent?

Where are you getting your information from?

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Predatory lesbian brainworms, I have forced myself to set the benchmark of "if someone repeatedly compliments your appearance they will probably be flattered even if they don't reciprocate" and that has helped.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

Told person who do not know the difference between authoritarian capitalistic dictatorship and commuism state.

Gonna throw out the word authoritarian because it is an empty signifier.

If China is a capitalist dictatorship why is the economy mostly publicly owned, with the percentage growing? Why does its government have a 95 percent approval rating according to a Harvard study, and why do innovations in participatory democracy emerge from China?

I just lurked into your account, this explains a LOT xD

Wow, what a vile little weirdo treating me being openly trans as some own.

23
submitted 5 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
26
submitted 5 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
22
submitted 7 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
25
submitted 7 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Press Statement by Spokesman for DPRK Ministry of National Defence Pyongyang, December 2 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Ministry of National Defence of the DPRK released the following press statement "Any attack on space asset of the DPRK will be deemed declaration of war against it" on Saturday:

The brigandish nature of the U.S., which regards it as its main lever for realizing its hegemonic wild ambition to commit outrageous and unlawful military intervention against sovereign countries, has been brought to light more clearly, occasioned by the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite launch.

An official concerned of the U.S. Space Command recently spouted rubbish hinting at a military attack on the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite, saying that the U.S. can decrease the enemy country's outer space operation capabilities by employing diverse "reversible and irreversible methods".

American military affairs experts comment that the U.S. Space Force can physically destroy not only opponent's satellite and satellite earth station but also get rid of enemy state's space force through jamming and virus-using cyber attack.

The U.S. Space Force's deplorable hostility toward the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite can never be overlooked as it is just a challenge to the sovereignty of the DPRK, and more exactly, a declaration war against it.

Article 8 of the "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies", the main international outer space treaty, stipulates that any object launched into outer space definitely falls under the jurisdiction of the launcher state and the ownership of it never changes no matter it remains in outer space or returned to the earth.

This means that the reconnaissance satellite "Malligyong-1" is a part of the territory of the DPRK where its sovereignty is exercised.

Furthermore, reconnaissance satellite is not regarded as a space weapon by international law for its technical features aimed at observation.

If the reconnaissance satellite of the DPRK is regarded by the U.S. as a "military threat" that must be gotten rid of, countless spy satellites of the U.S. flying above the Korean peninsula region every day, exclusively tasked with monitoring the major strategic spots of the DPRK, should be deemed the primary targets to be destroyed by the armed forces of the DPRK.

By openly unveiling its aggression scheme to mount a military attack on a space asset of other sovereign country, a part of its properties and territory, the U.S. has proved itself its true colors as the chief culprit of evils seeking to realize its wild ambition for dominating the world by turning outer space, common wealth of humankind, into a theater of war.

It is the mission of the armed forces of the DPRK, specified by its constitution and other laws, to exercise their war deterrent to protect the state sovereignty and territorial integrity in case a lethal military attack is carried out against the country's strategic assets or it is judged that such attack is imminent.

In case the U.S. tries to violate the legitimate territory of a sovereign state by weaponizing the latest technologies illegally and unjustly, the DPRK will consider taking responsive action measures for self-defence to undermine or destroy the viability of the U.S. spy satellites by exercising its legitimate rights vested by international and domestic laws. -0- www.kcna.kp (Juche112.12.2.)

56
submitted 8 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
45
submitted 8 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
-4
submitted 8 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world
143
submitted 9 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
74
submitted 11 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Some U.S. officials are frustrated at the pace of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which has gained less than 100 square miles of territory.

8
submitted 11 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world

Some U.S. officials are frustrated at the pace of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which has gained less than 100 square miles of territory.

366
No comment (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 11 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
19
Theory for Dronies (i.imgur.com)
submitted 11 months ago by OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
view more: next ›

OurToothbrush

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF