36
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
36 points (79.0% liked)
Asklemmy
43394 readers
1299 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I’ve heard people say the opposite, “wouldn’t piss on her if she was on fire”.
On fire is a good start
On fire and soaked in piss is better
Is my piss not supposed to be flammable?
You should use a condom next time
Well, hell is supposed to be forever. Eventually the liquid piss would evaporate, leaving behind solid compounds that, in my experience, would still smell quite bad. And then, she'd burst into flames again. Sounds like a win-win.
I was witness to what burnt piss does on a hot muffler.
It stinks, for miles. And months.
Actually both have the same meaning. Pissing on her while she's on fire would be to save her by soaking. And it's the least you can do (easier than getting water). This saying means that they wouldn't save Margaret Thatcher even if it was trivially easy to do so.
Are you explaining my own joke to me? Why?
Yeah sorry. Since you mentioned it's the opposite, I wrongly assumed that you didn't know the meaning.
thatsthejoke.jpg