140
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShadowRam@kbin.social 80 points 1 year ago

its a solid B

75/100

It's good.

It's not earth shattering, its not game of the year.

It scratches that Skyrim RPG itch but in space.

It's less buggy and less crashy than people were expecting.

It's not without its flaws.

It's a solid B

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

This might be the most concise and accurate review I've seen. Nothing long winded, no excuses, no fanboyism, being fair and holding it up as it is.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago

Personally I'd give it like a C or maybe B- at the top. It's fine, but there are so many missing basic quality of life features that should be there.

My biggest gripes are all focused on outposts though. Outposts seemed to be one of the focuses from the marketing material, but they're a pain in the ass to actually use. There's somehow no list of the outposts you have, let alone a way to view what they're producing. Outposts need to be linked together, but there's no way to sort or auto-delete items, so it all eventually will get clogged up with lead, or whatever other resource doesn't get used often. You'll have to manually go through your containers to remove the clog and just dump it on the ground, where it'll remain for the rest of your playthrough. There's no snapping for anything except storage containers and the habitation modules. Everything else has to be placed by hand with manual rotations, so nothing is ever lined up. The alignment will also change after you place an object, so literally nothing will ever be aligned.

I have issues with many other parts of the game too, but outposts seem so incomplete, and somehow generally worse than what we had in FO4. Yet, outposts were prominent in their marketing. How?

[-] timespace@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m not sure where you’re from, but in the US a 75/100 is a C. B would be 80-89.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 8 points 1 year ago
[-] Lazz45@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

What, is this Organic Chem?

[-] fritata_fritato@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago

In nz or Australia a C was 50%.

[-] wccrawford@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Where I'm from, 94-100 was an A, so 74-83 was still a C, but it would just squeak by.

[-] ShadowRam@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

50 > D
60 > C
70 > B
80 > A
90 > A+

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
140 points (86.8% liked)

Games

16407 readers
1507 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS