138
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Chipthemonk@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago

Ah the classic stolen lands argument. You seem to think that the lands were widely populated with a dense civilization by people that had a concept of land ownership. You might be surprised to know that the americas were not densely populated in the slightest and most of the people who migrated to the americas through Siberia (the “natives,” who are actually just early migrants from the Middle East like all early Homo sapiens) don’t always have a concept of land ownership because they lived nomadic lives.

Your arguments are juvenile.

[-] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Ahh I see. So genocide is a-okay as long as the victims weren't densely populated and didn't think of land in line with the European sense of ownership.

Really, if they didn't want to be brutally murdered, there should have been more of them and they should have created bits of paper saying who owned what land.

Makes sense.

[-] Chipthemonk@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Your argument is in fashion, but it’s simply not the reality. I suppose your argument is so popular and widespread because the history curriculum has not done a good job educating people.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
138 points (90.1% liked)

World News

32075 readers
879 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS