220

Budget: $120 million [source]

Opening weekend gross: $4 million

Factoring in marketing costs and the theaters taking their cut of the profits, Megalopolis would need to make at least $300 million to break even. I think it's safe to say that's not happening.

It would have been THE worst opening for a $100 million movie ever, had it not been for Pluto Nash's horriffic opening 22 years ago.

Even The New York Times is reporting near-empty screenings of Megalopolis!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thessnake03@lemmy.world 78 points 2 weeks ago

Even adjusting for inflation, Pluto Nash still wins. It opened to $3.5M in today's money.

I feel like there hasn't been much marketing for Megalopolis. Could be a factor. I'd say the long run time doesn't help, but Oppenheimer counters that point.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 71 points 2 weeks ago

Oppenheimer had the advantage of people knowing basically what the story was about. The poster for Megalopolis doesn't really tell me what it's about beyond Adam Driver apparently being an architect.

It's the same reason everything is a reboot or remake: A lot of the marketing cost has already been taken care of with the first movie.

[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

And it’s Adam Driver.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 44 points 2 weeks ago
[-] brap@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed, not heard of it outside Lemmy. Perhaps I’ve insulated myself from ads a little too well.

[-] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 21 points 2 weeks ago

I only heard about this because Coppola gave an interview about hiring "cancelled" actors so he didn't seem "woke".

Yeah no thanks, FFC. I still remember you defending and bankrolling a CONVICTED child predator.

[-] Kellamity@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Coppola was heavily involved in the production of the film where some of the abuse happened, and during the fallout he allegedly tried to sue the victim of the abuse for breach of contract

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 11 points 2 weeks ago

I've mostly heard about the controversies (the fake AI quotes in the trailer, some alleged #metoo stuff on set, ...). Reviews seem very mixed, some reviewers hate it, others love it, which makes me think some of them just don't 'get' it?

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah but usually if something is good, people will want to discuss it. This has gotten no hype, no post release discussion. It's a ghost.

Really odd for such a big budget movie.

[-] Sabin10@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

This is the second time I have heard about this film, the last time being the release of the first teaser trailer. Studios love to spend 70 million marketing budgets on broadcast TV advertising and completely missing their target audience. In the case of sci-fi, most of us are more responsive to online marketing campaigns and this film has the online presence of an Amish priest.

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

In the case of sci-fi, most of us are more responsive to online marketing campaigns and this film has the online presence of an Amish priest.

Even then, who is this movie for? Scifi nerds who liked Cloud Atlas but wished it was more incoherent and Roman themed?

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

aubrey plaza was on the daily show talking about it, so i assume they were doing the usual TV talk show tour.

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

You need to adjust the Pluto Nash budget for iflation as well. It was a ~$100 million budget in 2002.

Makes me wonder how many other movies did worse when we consider adjusting their budget to inflation.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Pluto Nash cost over 100 million dollars to make?

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
220 points (96.2% liked)

Movies

7324 readers
310 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS