sorted by: new top controversial old
[-] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 24 minutes ago

Yeah, why the hell is OP using SMS?

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 29 points 15 hours ago

He got rid of everyone else when he took over, he's still dealing with court cases about how he handled that.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 16 hours ago

There's no war in the West Bank, that's Gaza. And this is part of a pattern, the US didn't give a shit when Rachel Corrie was murdered, or Shireen Abu Akleh (during "peacetime").

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 17 hours ago

Having worked with designers in an ad agency (although not a designer myself), the male designers didn't ever have a good thing to say about the work of any of the female designers. Consequently, none of them stuck around for long (one of them is a creative director in a big agency now, so presumably she wasn't that bad).

Then again, they were assholes in many other respects as well, and the guys in the next companies I worked for were a lot better.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it's not like Minecraft itself is marketed to the hardcore gamer demographic. It's essentially a kids' movie. I suspect it might still suck at that though.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, it would be nice to see a comparison between a Chinese loan and a loan by the IMF. Maybe the sting still has to come because they haven't been doing it for as long, but there's got to be a good reason those countries go with China instead of the IMF.

To me it seems like IMF loans involve privatising revenue generating assets, lowering taxes on the wealthy and austerity on the masses. The biggest criticism of the Chinese way of financing is that if you default on the loan you used to build a port/highway/railway line, they keep that specific asset. And I guess instead of using local labour they use Chinese workers.

There's definitely things to criticise there, but I know which option I'd pick if I needed a port in my country.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah, Russia is funding all sorts of critics of the US government, some of them on the left too. Doesn't necessarily mean they agree with Russia on everything. When RT was still allowed to broadcast in the US, people like Chris Hedges had a show on there.

Honestly, I don't see how this indictment squares with the first amendment, especially after citizens united. If money is speech, what's the difference between some American billionaire funding some guys that say things they agree with, and a foreign government/billionaire doing the same? If they're banning Russian funding, why not ban Al Jazeera, Deutsche Welle, South China Morning Post, the BBC, etc?

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Holy crap, I always assumed the runner was pushing her whenever I saw this picture. Is this often posted with a wrong caption or something?

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 12 points 4 days ago

And now job boards are full of ads for 'salesforce developers' that pay ridiculous amounts because nobody really wants to work on salesforce.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 7 points 6 days ago

Or back in the days where Google Reader was a thing, one request from them could represent millions of readers.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago

Yep, do we want to have 2 parties where the candidate isn't accountable to viewers, or just the 1?

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago

Putin didn't care about optics in Beslan or at the Dubrovka Theater. He can control what the media knows about this, and even if villages are destroyed he can just blame the Ukrainians.

view more: next ›

jonne

joined 1 year ago