101

Grasshopper CEO Suda51 says people ‘care too much’ about Metacritic scores (www.videogameschronicle.com)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I honestly kind of agree with this. A lot of people see metacritic/opencritic scores and take it at face value. I a lot of people that would just instantly write off a game if it isn't higher than 80/100.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 16 points 5 days ago

I remember back in the 90s PC mags had the same issues, simple numerical ratings don’t mean shit.

The only score I follow is Steams user satisfies rating thing. the top voted complaints or praises tell me more about the state of a game than anything else ever could.

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

the advtage the steam system has is first the bought game/gifted game situation, as well as the more important factor, the recent opinion score, as at amy given momemt a game can get good because of a major change (e. g payday 2 reverting all the pay 2 win content the original publisher mandated) or gone to shit because of greed or a bad patch.

the problem users have is finding a curator that has a similar taste in games that they do. If I was a fan of JRPGs, im not going to care about the opinion on some person who doesnt really play jrpgs. at the same time, if you like some niche genre, to the general public, that niche is always less popular, so itll get worse ratings thanit should compared to people who enjoy said niche.