54
submitted 1 month ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] refalo@programming.dev -2 points 1 month ago

My understanding is that after the war, the US agreed to defend Japan. And Japan is still allowed to defend itself against others too. I don't understand how what you're saying is related at all.

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

The US occupied Japan. The agreement wasn't exactly one made by equals. It was the same kind of deal as the Marshall Plan.

Which parts of what I said don't seem related?

[-] refalo@programming.dev -3 points 1 month ago

The US occupied Japan

Only until 1952. Everything you're saying sounds like a strawman argument.

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Are you under the impression that we've left Japan?

[-] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Only until 1952

De jure, yes. But also what is your point? Do you think this contradicts anything I said?

Everything you're saying sounds like a strawman argument.

A straw man argument is where you pretend someone else is making an argument that they aren't because it is rhetorically easier to address.

At which point have I done that even once?

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
54 points (93.5% liked)

World News

32213 readers
898 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS