55
submitted 2 weeks ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club -3 points 2 weeks ago

It is weird that that policy is the one mentioned.

China could easily argue about the Roosevelt Corollary or other American foreign policies and that would be understandable. It just sounds weird that the foreign policy that China is actively arguing against is the one about foreign countries colonizing previously liberated countries in the Americas.

[-] antmzo220@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Because it's not interpreted as just being "about foreign countries colonizing previously liberated countries in the Americas"...

Is China asking to colonize countries in the Americas?

Comes off as very disingenuous and bad faith given the real world context.

Its as valid as saying

"Why would China call out the Monroe doctrine when it's about European countries, do they plan on joining Europe?!"...no.

It's ialso mportant to note:

The Roosevelt corollary, which you mention they would be right to call out, directly stems from the Monroe doctrine. It's "the Roosevelt corollary to the Monroe doctrine"

Abolishing the Monroe doctrine would therefore abolish the standing of the Roosevelt corollary...

Ironically a good example of the real world context you must consider and proof of the need to abandon the Monroe Doctrine.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
55 points (81.6% liked)

World News

32072 readers
1954 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS