889

Incase it doesn't show up:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

In my example, how is the code dependency exposed to the outside? The caller only knows about the List interface in my example.

[-] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 0 points 2 weeks ago

In your example, the declaration of ArrayList look like:

public class ArrayList extends AbstractList implements List {
}

The dependence on AbstractList is public. Any public method in AbstractList is also accessible from the outside. It opens up for tricky dependencies that can be difficult to unravel.

Compare it with my solution:

public class ArrayList implements List {
    private AbstractList = new AbstractList();
}

Nothing about the internals of ArrayList is exposed. You’re free to change the internals however you want. There’s no chance any outside code will depend on this implementation detail.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's not C++, which has more control over such scope.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
889 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32050 readers
1390 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS